New sponsor needed

Status
Not open for further replies.

Genuinely wondering if due to the new stadium and (in my opinion) an optimistic season next year we can attract a more lucrative shirt sponsor.

If so could they potentially pay off the stake deal and get a good deal sorted?

Those clubs were able to get rid of Castore mid deal.
 
Sheedy said:
I don't get it. What's the hate against Stake?
Click to expand...

They also put their logo on viral memes to induce children to gambling.

Pay Drake to live stream gambling and winning loads when they know it's the younger generation who watch that sort of thing.

Rottten organisation and embarrassed they're on our shirt. Just glad my son doesn't have to go round with it on his shirt.
 
IMG_7085.webp
IMG_7085.webp
 

The problem with Stake is, theyve got a bad reputation, so none of the 'Big 6' would entertain them, so we in essence were their primary football sponsor, and the annual fee demonstrated that.

Bit concerned for next year, as with no Gambling deals, outside of the "Big 6", the majority of teams were sponsored by Gambling firms.

Last season, only Brighton and Ipswich had sponsorships which weren't and at £10m, ours represented the 10th highest.

With those off the table, and less competitiveness, what are we realistically expecting for 26/27? Hopefully TFG can use their resources and Roma connections to keep that figure high enough.
 
barneygumble said:
The problem with Stake is, theyve got a bad reputation, so none of the 'Big 6' would entertain them, so we in essence were their primary football sponsor, and the annual fee demonstrated that.

Bit concerned for next year, as with no Gambling deals, outside of the "Big 6", the majority of teams were sponsored by Gambling firms.

Last season, only Brighton and Ipswich had sponsorships which weren't and at £10m, ours represented the 10th highest.

With those off the table, and less competitiveness, what are we realistically expecting for 26/27? Hopefully TFG can use their resources and Roma connections to keep that figure high enough.
Click to expand...

I honestly think if Chelsea, Arsenal, Man City, etc wanted to be sponsored by booze, cigarettes and gambling, it would all be fine, the social impact would be minimised in the media. When we were sponsored by Chang I had some RS tell me that is was morally wrong for us to be sponsored by them. Forgetting that his own beloved team had Carlsberg on their kits for 18 years!

The ban on gambling advertising on Premier league shirts is only about trying to restrict the earnings of the 14 and nothing to do with what is right form a moral perspective. Also how the likes of Sky and Talksport can comment on the morals of advertising and then cut to and advert for Skybet is just hilarious to me.

Thankfully City have already fought the case for 3rd party transactions, which covers club owners sponsoring their own teams, so we should be OK. If TFG cant get a better or comparable sponsor to Stake, they can choose to sponsor us through one of their businesses
 

OneTrueLegend said:
I honestly think if Chelsea, Arsenal, Man City, etc wanted to be sponsored by booze, cigarettes and gambling, it would all be fine, the social impact would be minimised in the media. When we were sponsored by Chang I had some RS tell me that is was morally wrong for us to be sponsored by them. Forgetting that his own beloved team had Carlsberg on their kits for 18 years!

The ban on gambling advertising on Premier league shirts is only about trying to restrict the earnings of the 14 and nothing to do with what is right form a moral perspective. Also how the likes of Sky and Talksport can comment on the morals of advertising and then cut to and advert for Skybet is just hilarious to me.

Thankfully City have already fought the case for 3rd party transactions, which covers club owners sponsoring their own teams, so we should be OK. If TFG cant get a better or comparable sponsor to Stake, they can choose to sponsor us through one of their businesses
Click to expand...
Kick, our sleeve sponsor, are also owned by Stake.

It'll be similar to F1 and cigarette liveries etc. really, if they wanted to do it. Or how Sela is sponsoring Newcastle.
 
OneTrueLegend said:
I honestly think if Chelsea, Arsenal, Man City, etc wanted to be sponsored by booze, cigarettes and gambling, it would all be fine, the social impact would be minimised in the media. When we were sponsored by Chang I had some RS tell me that is was morally wrong for us to be sponsored by them. Forgetting that his own beloved team had Carlsberg on their kits for 18 years!

The ban on gambling advertising on Premier league shirts is only about trying to restrict the earnings of the 14 and nothing to do with what is right form a moral perspective. Also how the likes of Sky and Talksport can comment on the morals of advertising and then cut to and advert for Skybet is just hilarious to me.

Thankfully City have already fought the case for 3rd party transactions, which covers club owners sponsoring their own teams, so we should be OK. If TFG cant get a better or comparable sponsor to Stake, they can choose to sponsor us through one of their businesses
Click to expand...
Not everything is a conspiracy to keep us down.

I can't wait until Stake is booted off our shirts.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top