Murder She Punched?

[kev101]

Uuuuuuuuuuuuugly!!!!! That's not tit's, it's her fat purple blotchy belly hoisted up onto scaffolding.

 

[ricardobee]

those arms were made for bagpiping

 

[Tubey]

Nope. She never had the intent to kill (mens rea) meaning she's innocent of murder and manslaughter any day of the week.

As for reckless conduct and battery... well, it's definitely not battery, as the punch was requested. It's the reason every time consenting adults have sex then it's not sexual assault or rape, as it's consensual.

However, you could make a case for it being reckless conduct as throwing a punch, even if requested to, could reasonably result in injury.

 

[Seamus Colemole]

Nope. She never had the intent to kill (mens rea) meaning she's innocent of murder and manslaughter any day of the week.

As for reckless conduct and battery... well, it's definitely not battery, as the punch was requested. It's the reason every time consenting adults have sex then it's not sexual assault or rape, as it's consensual.

However, you could make a case for it being reckless conduct as throwing a punch, even if requested to, could reasonably result in injury.

Hasn't there been people who have been charged with manslaughter after a punch or a shove resulted in a person falling backwards and banging their head on the ground which then caused fatal injury?

Sure the difference in this case is that the punch was requested but if the aforementioned cases can have someone prosecuted for the results of their actions rather than their actions themselves coudl this one not?

I don't think it should but if other cases have....................

 

[Tubey]

Hasn't there been people who have been charged with manslaughter after a punch or a shove resulted in a person falling backwards and banging their head on the ground which then caused fatal injury?

Sure the difference in this case is that the punch was requested but if the aforementioned cases can have someone prosecuted for the results of their actions rather than their actions themselves coudl this one not?

I don't think it should but if other cases have....................

But that would be battery. The fact it was requested makes a world of difference.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/battery

Battery

At common law, an intentional unpermitted act causing harmful or offensive contact with the "person" of another.


If the punch was not requested, it would automatically become battery, and could easily be involuntary manslaughter. There's no such thing as "just a punch" - bodily contact that results in death, no matter how minor, in manslaughter if that contact was a direct cause of the death.

 

[andrewkgsmith]

Nope. She never had the intent to kill (mens rea) meaning she's innocent of murder and manslaughter any day of the week.

As for reckless conduct and battery... well, it's definitely not battery, as the punch was requested. It's the reason every time consenting adults have sex then it's not sexual assault or rape, as it's consensual.

However, you could make a case for it being reckless conduct as throwing a punch, even if requested to, could reasonably result in injury.

Pretty much this.
Does anyone else find her more attractive knowing she could kill you easily, or am I just messed up?

 

[Seamus Colemole]

But that would be battery. The fact it was requested makes a world of difference.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/battery

Battery

At common law, an intentional unpermitted act causing harmful or offensive contact with the "person" of another.


If the punch was not requested, it would automatically become battery, and could easily be involuntary manslaughter. There's no such thing as "just a punch" - bodily contact that results in death, no matter how minor, in manslaughter if that contact was a direct cause of the death.

Ah cheers for that.