• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Man Utd Sign New Kit Deal With Adidas - £750m over 10 Years

Status
Not open for further replies.
I sure do.

United bought a player today which took their summer spending to more or less the equal of Chelsea and City combined.

That took their spending to over £200 million in less than a year.

Feel free to correct any factual errors in those two sentences.

:)

I forgot that their ownership began in 2013 and not 2005. My bad.
 

I sure do.

United bought a player today which took their summer spending to more or less the equal of Chelsea and City combined.

That took their spending to over £200 million in less than a year.

Feel free to correct any factual errors in those two sentences.

:)

I believe there is a place for everyone in the world mate, a special place for some!
 
I forgot that their ownership began in 2013 and not 2005. My bad.

No worries.

United won more league titles in that period from 2005 thru' 2013, when the Glazers arrived, than they did in the right years previous to it.

Yip.....that eight years before the Glazers arrived in 2013 sure was a Golden Age at OT.

United have won nowt since the Glazers took over in 2013,

Despite the £200 million and counting the buggers have spent.

:confused:
 
I believe there is a place for everyone in the world mate, a special place for some!

...er.....I am still waiting for you to correct the factual inaccuracies in my post re United's spending this past eleven and a bit months,

I guess you are struggling to find any, huh?

:(
 
seriously though, 75 mil a year? what do we get? 2 mil? one can only hope the better football and more exposure we are producing can produce a miracle on this front...:rant:
 

...er.....I am still waiting for you to correct the factual inaccuracies in my post re United's spending this past eleven and a bit months,

I guess you are struggling to find any, huh?

:(

The inaccuracies are that the Glazers aren't bleeding the club dry and they haven't spent 200mill on players, spending = trophies point your trying to make, which by the fact that the premise of your arguement matched with the reality of an 11month trophyless spending splurge: pretty much sinks the hole in the ropey peddle boat that I like to mentally metaphor as the symbolic representation of your arguement!
 
Last edited:
The inaccuracies are that the Glazers aren't bleeding the club dry and they haven't spent 200mill on players, spending = trophies point your trying to make, which by the fact that the premise of your arguement matched with the reality of an 11month trophyless spending splurge: pretty much sinks the hole in the ropey peddle boat that I like to mentally metaphor as the symbolic representation of your arguement!


So, in other words you can't refute one word of what I have posted.

;)
 
The inaccuracies are that the Glazers aren't bleeding the club dry and they haven't spent 200mill on players, spending = trophies point your trying to make, which by the fact that the premise of your arguement matched with the reality of an 11month trophyless spending splurge: pretty much sinks the hole in the ropey peddle boat that I like to mentally metaphor as the symbolic representation of your arguement!


Jesus, what a terribly worded post. Edmund Hillary would struggle to find your point.
 
This, the archetypal leveraged buy out - it really is an amazing swindle!

Would have never had become a "swindle" had Manchester United not gotten greedy by going public.

Once they went public, they were fair game by any means available, including leveraged buy out.

Manchester United supporters have absolutely no right to bitch and moan about the methods when it was going public (a decision made by their own people) that put the bullseye on them.

I have no sympathy for them at all on that point. It was their greed and not the Glazers that put them in that situation.
 
"Look at the Glazers... you would have thought they were nothing but a bunch of Americans intent on buying the club and selling off Old Trafford to Tesco judging by the howl of protests from the fans. Within two seasons though, they had won the title and built a squad the envy of Europe."

You don't hear a massive amount about the Glazers, these days. Or, at least, not enough. Not if you aren't a Manchester United fan, anyway. There's just too much shambolic about United on the pitch to bother with stuff off the pitch, and it might seem like a proper critique of their time in Manchester requires a detailed knowledge of financial data, which is frankly too boring to even try to understand.

The good thing about the Glazers though, is that the headline figures are more than enough to judge them. They've taken in the region of £700million out of the club since arriving in 2005, in assorted fees, interest and other payments with complicated acronyms. A few weeks ago, they made a handy $127million from selling shares to an investment firm. That's a decent basis for an opinion.‎

But it's all OK, isn't it? Because they're spending money now, aren't they? Loads of it, in fact, with north of £150million lavished this summer on a variety of players, some of them really very good. So everything's cool? Well, obviously not.

At this point it's worth saying that this could be something of a straw man piece. There have been, to my knowledge, no serious articles defending the Glazers or praising them excessively for finally opening their chequebooks. The quote at the top of this article, from the great man Tim Lovejoy, currently stands as perhaps the only scholarly defence of the way they have run Manchester United.

But those pieces will come, and at some point soon, too. If you care to treat Twitter as anything close to a reliable barometer of opinion, just do a search for 'Glazers well done' or 'Glazers finally', then resist the urge to take a long walk in the woods.

This year has seen unprecedented spending at Manchester United, and that they have splashed so much cash on their team and it's still hugely flawed gives you an indication of how jiggered they were, and perhaps still are. You'll have read many times about Sir Alex Ferguson's neglect in relying on his own brilliance and letting his squad fall into such abysmal disrepair, but it's worth repeating the point.

Of course it was only partly the old man's fault. Ferguson frequently praised the Glazers, and indeed famously and charmingly instructed United's supporters to "go and support Chelsea" if they didn't like them. But if you think Ferguson was happy mending and making do, adding decent but ultimately not quite good enough players when this was the man who'd previously spent millions on Andy Cole, Dwight Yorke, Ruud van Nistelrooy, Juan Sebastian Veron and Rio Ferdinand, then pass on your email address, because you've just inherited £63million from a Saudi prince and all I need is your bank details to make the first payment.

The Glazers haven't spent money this summer for altruistic reasons, but rather out of desperation, knowing that although they can handle a couple of years of mediocrity and lurking outside the Champions League, they know the sooner they get back in the better for their own investment.

The only reason United have been forced to spend this much in one go is because of the neglect under their stewardship. They have created this problem through years of funneling the club's money towards their own debt rather than the team, and now they don't have a once in a generation genius to help them save face, they're trying to spend their way out of trouble.

Congratulating the Glazers for this transfer window is a little like thanking someone for buying you a new shirt after they've just spent nine years punching you in the nose. Or thanking a man for taping your Ming vase back together after smashing it into tiny pieces.

For the first time in nearly a decade, Manchester United are spending money as they can, and indeed as they should have been doing for years before. Meanwhile, the Glazers still pocket £100million after leeching for nine years. It's the most obvious thing in football to point out that they Glazers are poison, but it's well to remember they shouldn't be thanked for this burst of spending.

For those who are a little hard of understanding, it's here in tabloid form.

If they didn't cause Kopites to go into a perm state of paranoia it would have been fun to see what would have happened had Fergie not been at the helm. Mid-table would have become the rule rather than the exception.
 
Last edited:

Your average united fan isn't much different than your average kopite, only he hasn't become bitter and twisted by a recent lack of success.

Yet.
I suspect you are dead right mate. The sense of entitlement which, when success ceases, manifests itself in "bitter and twisted" (and downright weird) ways, might currently be somewhat delitescent in the majority Man U fan base, but its insidious, toxic nature will be seen in due course.
Get your popcorn ready, because between LFC and ManU fans, a LOT of spectator comedy is heading our way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top