Liverpool Echo Throws Dummy Out Of Pram

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dudes, when it's plain to see that the editorial bias is spun, censored, and manipulative--why don't you just swerve the chip-wrapper. I would, as it would be fair to say that they will deal with non-sporting issues similarly too :)
 
:lol:

How is it? It's in the book, so it could be an accompanying image, couldn't it? That's your point about the image use in this article after all!

The book is several hundred pages long or several hours long, and many different things occur in said book or movie. The article discusses a few events, the most recent of which was the work Distin did with Everton in the Community. There is nothing weird about using that picture alongside that article.
 
The book is several hundred pages long or several hours long, and many different things occur in said book or movie. The article discusses a few events, the most recent of which was the work Distin did with Everton in the Community. There is nothing weird about using that picture alongside that article.

OK, there's a story on the Sky Sports website right now about Lewis Hamilton talking about his new Mercedes car after spinning out into the gravel.

It's a new team for him, a brand new car in development, he's a celebrity and it's a popular sport.

The equivalent to that Echo article would be Sky choosing to use this image to accompany that story.

gravel.jpg
 
OK, there's a story on the Sky Sports website right now about Lewis Hamilton talking about his new Mercedes car after spinning out into the gravel.

It's a new team for him, a brand new car in development, he's a celebrity and it's a popular sport.

The equivalent to that Echo article would be Sky choosing to use this image to accompany that story.

gravel.jpg

Nonsense.

That's a nondescript picture of some gravel. You'd be right if you had posted a picture of Hamilton's car on said gravel.
 

Or the more likely option, that the article was written and the person in charge of content on the website has chosen a relevant image.
Don't think that is the true application in this piece, it is done under direction, to present a particular slant. Perception and subterfuge.
You have to remember that not everyone who reads that piece will have followed the entirety of the phone in and subsequent events. This is a definite piece of persuasive disinformation, to paint the 2 sides in very different lights, the club as victim completely.
It is quite sick when you pick through the thought processes used in this.
 
I think the point is we all know exactly why they have written the article, as someone has said its a siege mentality we are all agreed that the article is totally unjustified and that the club had made them doing, let's not get bogged down on a picture contained in the article.

Stans show has clearly stirred up the hornets nest and embarrassed them and made the club look more idiotic and shambolic then they already are, not that they need much help.

We are all evertonians let's not fight amongst ourselves over something that frankly ain't worth fighting over... Besides pineapple or no pineapple on pizza that's worth fighting over!!!
 
Don't think that is the true application in this piece, it is done under direction, to present a particular slant. Perception and subterfuge.
You have to remember that not everyone who reads that piece will have followed the entirety of the phone in and subsequent events. This is a definite piece of persuasive disinformation, to paint the 2 sides in very different lights, the club as victim completely.
It is quite sick when you pick through the thought processes used in this.

Your wasting your time fella, according to some on here the fella would argue with himself if he saw his own shadow.
 
Don't think that is the true application in this piece, it is done under direction, to present a particular slant. Perception and subterfuge.
You have to remember that not everyone who reads that piece will have followed the entirety of the phone in and subsequent events. This is a definite piece of persuasive disinformation, to paint the 2 sides in very different lights, the club as victim completely.
It is quite sick when you pick through the thought processes used in this.

Nail on the Head

The Echo wouldn't even put an authors name on the first article; that paper is a disgrace
 
Nonsense.

That's a nondescript picture of some gravel. You'd be right if you had posted a picture of Hamilton's car on said gravel.

Nope because that'd be an actual picture of the story.

Another one - current Sky News story.

Shark Dies During Kmart Advert Filming In US

So the story has a shark, that died, a well known brand in the US, a country etc.

It also has this throwaway line.

Last year, the horse-racing show Luck on HBO was axed after the deaths of three horses used in the drama series.

But, surprisingly, Sky didn't run with this image for the article entitled "Shark Dies During Kmart Advert Filming In US"

luck-hbo-tv-show-horse.jpg


Wonder why!
 

Nope because that'd be an actual picture of the story.

Another one - current Sky News story.

Shark Dies During Kmart Advert Filming In US

So the story has a shark, that died, a well known brand in the US, a country etc.

It also has this throwaway line.



But, surprisingly, Sky didn't run with this image for the article entitled "Shark Dies During Kmart Advert Filming In US"

luck-hbo-tv-show-horse.jpg


Wonder why!

Again, a terrible comparison.

The article is discussing fans attitudes, a key part of that is abuse which has been aimed at a wide variety of people including, most sickeningly, Distin regarding his charity work.

4/10 must try harder.
 
Again, a terrible comparison.

The article is discussing fans attitudes, a key part of that is abuse which has been aimed at a wide variety of people including, most sickeningly, Distin regarding his charity work.

4/10 must try harder.

When you start using ratings you know you're in a bit of a hole. :P
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top