ive just watched the game again (yep slow day at work) and i have to say overall most players didnt play too bad , not great , but not too bad.
mccarthy i still think was flat and lacked a spark but i especially looked out for osman .
first half he was adequate but it was difficult to see what role he was actually playing , i dont think he knew tbh.
second  half though is a different matter. most of the wba attacks came past  him. he offered very little cover for baines (pulling baines and barry  out of position) it was a throw back to those moyes games where osman  played in front of hibbert. 
when he did get goal side he was very  slow to close down , not even making a tackle instead choosing to plod  within 5 meters of the attacking player and just stand there waiting for  them to pass to an overlapping player. 
the biggest notable problem  was when on the counter attack for either team. we countered - by the  time we were in the wba final third osman was only just over the half  way line. when wba countered and got in our final third osman was again  only just back over the half way line. watch it and note the closing  down and counter attacking position of oviedo on the opposite flank compared to ossie. its  draw dropping the difference. osmans legs have gone imo.