I think it does? If Richarlison and DCL weren't so impotent we'd have been out of sight before they equalised.
But they still scored 3 goals, that had nothing to do with the strikers
I think it does? If Richarlison and DCL weren't so impotent we'd have been out of sight before they equalised.
There were Few time in that second half he was mes to forwards , must have been told to play that way?I’ve never seen him have a good shot.
Yet with 10 mins to go in a must not lose match he gets himself miles out of position and decides to try a 40 yarder when there’s no one covering him and he has a defender charging him.
What?
Of which, what, one of them was Kenny's fault?But they still scored 3 goals, that had nothing to do with the strikers
Of which, what, one of them was Kenny's fault?
I'm not arguing with you. My point is that Evertonians don't half pick strange scapegoats. Two penalties or not, every attack broke down with Richarlison again.I didn't blame all 3 on Kenny? I just said, as poor as strikers might be, you should not need to score 4 goals to beat Burnley.
Agreed he's clearly notgood enough but what about the rest who cost a fortune.I'm not arguing with you. My point is that Evertonians don't half pick strange scapegoats. Two penalties or not, every attack broke down with Richarlison again.
Kenny is not PL standard, but he's not the biggest culprit here imo.
Of which, what, one of them was Kenny's fault?