2025/26 James Tarkowski


Kevsleftpeg said:
Did I say we were on the ropes? That's just your own imagination. I said we were hanging on for half time. Which we were. They had there most dominant period of the match from 30 mins on until we scored our second. We were defending deep, not mounting any attacks or having any possession. The only team that looked like they might score in that period was them. So yes, we wanted halftime to come so we could reorganise. Maybe you don't follow football (or the written word) that well?
Click to expand...
I can tell that you may actually be a lawyer. You stating things as facts, doesn't work here. Maybe when your peers, in this thread are disagreeing with you, you should respect that. Or should I reveal my qualifications/line of work which is also irrelevant?
 
SJB said:
They had two spells of pressure in that first half, I think the second spell was where Pickford made a decent save from Anderson but other than that shot it didn't feel like they were really threatening us, and we soon took back control of the game before nicking that second goal on a breakaway. Certainly didn't feel like we were riding our luck at the game, sometimes the match threads on here are a bit melodramatic.

View attachment 336451
View attachment 336452
Click to expand...
Oops, there's them facts Kopite Kev...
 
This place does my nut in.

One day I find out after respectfully reading a bloody massive post, that I've actually just read an AI generated response.

The next time, I find myself debating over a player/performance with a poster, only to than find out later they use the matchday thread instead of actually watching us 🤔

Ive never used the ignore button, but if i found out someone was responding to me through AI, that could possibly be the one thing that pushes me to use it...
 

DrEFC said:
I can tell that you may actually be a lawyer. You stating things as facts, doesn't work here. Maybe when your peers, in this thread are disagreeing with you, you should respect that. Or should I reveal my qualifications/line of work which is also irrelevant?
Click to expand...
I was talking about the definition of a legal term so my qualifications are relevant squire.
 
Swartzy said:
This place does my nut in.

One day I find out after respectfully reading a bloody massive post, that I've actually just read an AI generated response.

The next time, I find myself debating over a player/performance with a poster, only to than find out later they use the matchday thread instead of actually watching us 🤔

Ive never used the ignore button, but if i found out someone was responding to me through AI, that could possibly be the one thing that pushes me to use it...
Click to expand...
I did watch every second of the match as it happ ns. And I read the match day thread at half time. It is possible to receive information from multiple sources. Absolutely insane that you and others don't think Forest were on top going into halftime. MAGA levels of delusion.
 
Kevsleftpeg said:
I did watch every second of the match as it happ ns. And I read the match day thread at half time. It is possible to receive information from multiple sources. Absolutely insane that you and others don't think Forest were on top going into halftime. MAGA levels of delusion.
Click to expand...
You've lost me mate, I was talking in general, nothing to do with you.

But if that response was AI generated, than we could have a case on our hands..

Get your facts inplace and stop with your outbursts, like everything is about you.
 

DrEFC said:
I can tell that you may actually be a lawyer. You stating things as facts, doesn't work here. Maybe when your peers, in this thread are disagreeing with you, you should respect that. Or should I reveal my qualifications/line of work which is also irrelevant?
Click to expand...
You’re a mechanic, aren’t you? I’ve always had you down as a mechanic.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top