Gestures for the the Queen before West Ham game

What is your preferred method


  • Total voters
    519
Status
Not open for further replies.

the British Monarchy outlawed Sati, thousands of deaths will have been saved and loads of women in India will be grateful to this day that such a barbaric custom was pretty much ended.
All that can be claimed from something like this is a mixed-bag record. It doesn't answer the charges any more than, say, claiming that defeating Nazi Germany and the Marshall Plan justify what the United States did to Native Americans in the 19th Century (or afterward, for that matter).
 

By the same reasoning you can also show full respect and mourning without having (yet another) memoriam at a football game that has no connection to the person you are mourning.

People can, and will show respect in their own ways.

The question is whether to audibly protest or not isn't it?

Sometimes in life, things happen in front of you that you can't control. All you can control is your reaction.

I wouldn't boo my worst enemy when they snuff it.

So I wouldn't be arsed booing at a football pitch regarding the death of an 96 woman I've never met.
 
How about turn around during moment of silence, still showing respect to the dead by not booing, but also sending a message that we do not support the royal family and their noncey ways?
 
My silence would be just because some mates take comfort in the monarchy so for the sake of a minute either being quiet or staying on the concourse it’s no thing really.

The media and West Ham fans will be dying to trip us up over this but we’ve got nothing to prove to either of them.
Throw in some pyro and a pitch invasion just to get their attention.
 

All that can be claimed from something like this is a mixed-bag record. It doesn't answer the charges any more than, say, claiming that defeating Nazi Germany and the Marshall Plan justify what the United States did to Native Americans in the 19th Century (or afterward, for that matter).
yes it`s a mixed bag record, as it is with most Empire building.

but Britain going out on a limb to end international slavery on its own and the outlawing of barbarism in its colonies instead of perpetrating worse crimes against populations should at least be recognised
 
yes it`s a mixed bag record, as it is with most Empire building.

but Britain going out on a limb to end international slavery on its own and the outlawing of barbarism in its colonies instead of perpetrating worse crimes against populations should at least be recognised
I would say that propping up the second-largest local power all across the globe in order to guarantee substantial influence is a fairly cynical strategy, myself.
 
the British Monarchy outlawed Sati, thousands of deaths will have been saved and loads of women in India will be grateful to this day that such a barbaric custom was pretty much ended.
Britain robbed India of 1.5 trillion and 1.8 billion Indians died of deprivation. You are just brainwashed.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top