HowardsWay
Player Valuation: £6m
That will certainly need some explaining... absolutely speaks of fiddling the books.
- Status
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
If it was about Covid costs it would be for previous seasons not 21/22.
“The assessment period for which it is alleged that the Club is in breach is the period ending Season 2021/22."
stevie blott
Player Valuation: £2.5m
Tell that to Reading
Bluesnapper
Player Valuation: £8m
But the Gov have not put it into place yet.
Also is that independant panel the same independant panel the PL have set up?
Everton sponsor stake.com apparently hacked and robbed by North Korea 
Everton sponsor stake.com apparently hacked and robbed by North Korea
The People’s Club.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
Sure, but I was assuming if they bought the figures for the previous two seasons they would buy the 8m figure for 21/22. But then I don't actually know how that figure would be arrived at for 21/22.
Neither do the Premier League.
its almost as if the FFP system is an unworkable mess
The binman chronicles
Player Valuation: £80m
Everton sponsor stake.com apparently hacked and robbed by North Korea
Just watch the hacks at the Daily Mail present that as 'Everton linked with nuclear attacks'.
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
That would make sense if FFP or P&S were there to actually achieve what they say they want to do... in reality it's to keep rich clubs at the top and it's working, watch Newcastle struggle over the next few years...
ForeverEverton
Player Valuation: £40m
If I`m honest I think the PL were forced to do this by the clubs relegated last season and the season before.
PL P&S is made of of a rolling 3 years accounts, so it wouldn`t be just last year. Period ending i.e. 21/22, 20/21, 19/20...
The Premier League stated they accepted our books at the time of disputes from other relegation clubs, so if they have not perused the diligently they are also libel for the error? At the time, they accepted them to be OK ?
PeregrineT
Player Valuation: £35m
Right, but if it was an issue with the years 20/21 or 19/20 the charge would have been based on those years, OR included those years like they did with City etc. While the prior years are included I think that basically means it was fine up until 21/22, then they say the team just hit over 105m in the 3 year cycle by the end of 21/22(or there was a not-allowed accounting specifically in that year).
- Status
