Fellaini ( from a belgian perspective )

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mostly headers, although he can score with a deviation or something like that (like his first goal for Everton), he has these long legs he uses to get in between...

If you're lucky he scores from a distance shot about once a year, he can place a ball very well so he can score from just outside the penalty box, but he doesn't really have the force to shoot from 25/30 metres

If you get free kicks he's too valuable inside the box to let him take them, I can recall games where he made a header on almost every free kick that got in front of the goal. I don't think I've ever seen him take one himself while he was at Standard Liege or with the national team...

So if you can find someone to get the free kicks past the first post/opposite defender (maybe VDM :D), he'll cause mayhem inside the box...

direct free kicks around the box though you dont want to be aiming for anyone, and if the ball isnt making it to him then why aim for him, i just had a thought that with those long legs he may be able to either hit from distance or wrap them round the ball to curl it.
 

Scholes made up for it with amazing ability though, he's simply a far better footballer than Fellaini. Keane as we all know was one of the most all round midfielders this League has seen, he was superb in most areas. Both are also hardworkers, Fellaini isn't.

There's nothing wrong with being slow if you have something else about you. Xabi Alonso for example makes up for his lack of pace because of his passing ability, movement off the ball and ability to find space.

I look at Fellaini and I see a decent player, a nuisence but he doesn't have any standout qualities. I look to Tom Huddlestone for example. Also a very inmobile player but in other areas he's superb. He has something about him that makes him standout.

Fellaini is just decent. On his day he'll be a real handful but he'll also have alot of games where he looks like a nothing player, like yesterday for example.

We could have bought alot better for me, that's the only thing that bugs me. We could've bought a creative midfielder or a ball winner which would've solved alot of problems. Signing Fellaini hasn't solved many problems sadly.

On the money.
 
One thing I really don't understand is the flack he gets for playing short and simple passes.

We moan when Neville and Jagielka hit long balls to the corner flags and we moan when Fellaini plays a short pass to Arteta. The players are damned if they do and are damned if they don't. Unless they've got braided hair and do a few step overs once a blue moon.

Rant over.

Short and simple are not bad if you can use them to get out of tight situation or open up spaces when being double up. But you can't rely that all the time, that is what fellaini is doing. Has anyone forget how gravesen and manny open up defences with through ball using different arrays of splitting passes? It is one of the most important abilities a midfielder should have but I see none of this in fellaini.
 

Hi all.

I've just registered but have been reading this forum ever since Standard met Everton in the UEFA Cup.

I've watched most Everton matches since Marouane joined Goodison Park, and I 've read your opinions about him, and how he went from "worst transfer in Everton history" to "worldclass player in the making" to "average player at best". And I've read Cal's opinion about him ( :P )

Clearly he's been [Poor language removed] today ( and you were very poor as a whole )

Still, there seems to be a lot of misperceptions about him.
If you were thinking you had sign the "belgian Gattuso", you were waaaayyyy off the line. I've understood it's how he's been introduced to the fans by the Everton management. He is not your typical defensive midfielder. He's a special kind of player, if you expect him to tackle left and right and run the midfield from left to right , you're in for a big dissapointement, cause it's not gonna happen. And apparently, that's what you've been paying for.

From what I've seen today, your midfield was Osman-Fellaini-Cahill-Arteta . HELL, it's NEVER gonna work!!! If you can't use him properly, he's gonna look lost and useless on the field, as he did today.

As I said already, Marouane is a special kind of player, physically strong, a monster in the air ( well, not today ), can give a clean pass and bring his presence into the box; more importantly he has both defensive and attacking qualities, BUT you cannot rely on him for pure defending or pure attacking. He can run up and down, not left and right. He absolutely needs another special brand of player next to him to allow him to perform as well as he can. Someone with creativity in his feet who can also tackle and win a lot of balls. Take someone like Iniesta or Pirlo.

At Standard he was playing central midfield with Steven Defour. Well he's that special kind of player : despite being labelled "attacking midfielder", most of the time he was playing behind Marouane, building the attack from low on the pitch, while Marouane would break the opponent's attacks from very high. Also, Marouane would benefit from the spaces Defour opened up ( attacking play ), and Defour would be as important as Marouane in the defensive play. Thats how the supposedly defensive midfielder ( Marouane ) used to score a lot more and be a lot more dangerous on the whole than the supposedly attacking midfielder ( Defour )

I've read that your manager Moyes said he had been scouting Marouane for a year. Well, he's either lying, or doesn't know [Poor language removed] about football, cause he should have seen that!!

Notice how Marouane best performances under a blue shirt came when Cahill wasn't playing, as he was allowed to go to the other box and not strickly stuck to a defensive role.

You may say part of the explanation come from the level difference between the Jupier League and the Premierleague, and you may be right, but seeing how he bossed the spanish midfield with belgium a month ago, I think your manager needs to redefine his tactics to give Marouane the opportunity to express his qualities.

Hope it helps!!


And that is my main reason as to why The big Fella was signed. He does the Cahill role, and offers more alongside.

I don't mean this to criticise Cahill, I just think it has been done to raise both of their games.

2 for every position. Thats the way to have a squad.
 
And that is my main reason as to why The big Fella was signed. He does the Cahill role, and offers more alongside.

I don't mean this to criticise Cahill, I just think it has been done to raise both of their games.

2 for every position. Thats the way to have a squad.

We didn't really need another Cahill though. We need something different. A midfielder who could open up teams in central positions or a Carsley replacement.

Saha for me was the man to keep Cahill on his toes as both are competing to play alongside Yakubu.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top