Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 110 7.8%
  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,298 92.2%

  • Total voters
    1,408
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that RM has known for a while that he was not going to be manager past the end of this season.
I think there may have been an agreement to let him finish the season and then leave quietly in the summer.
The last two games had changed the mood dramatically and I think that RM may have recognised that next Sunday had the potential to be a very bad day.
I cannot help but feel that the timing of his dismissal may have been with the agreement of RM.
The atmosphere on Sunday will be totally different now, however there are a couple of players who deserve polite applause at best because of their awful attitude in recent weeks.
I know they had lost confidence in the manager but from the outside and with no knowledge of what was happening on the training ground every day it looked unprofessional.
 

I will say it now.
Moshiri is going to have to bring in another major investor to support him if he wants to put the club on top of the pile.
Until then I think he will sweep the stairs from top to bottom but our ambitions remain steady eddy which is fine if he comes out and tells the fans that is our ambition and nothing more for now.
 
I think that RM has known for a while that he was not going to be manager past the end of this season.
I think there may have been an agreement to let him finish the season and then leave quietly in the summer.
The last two games had changed the mood dramatically and I think that RM may have recognised that next Sunday had the potential to be a very bad day.
I cannot help but feel that the timing of his dismissal may have been with the agreement of RM....

I think there are legal and contractual issues at play here, of which we have no knowledge. Something was keeping him in a job longer than he should have been and something was in place to keep him past the Norwich game. And then it all changed and Everton took the settlement payout on the chin.
 

Latest front page article:




Good stuff Esk, the comparison chart really goes some way to displaying how far off we are from competing financially with those teams.

When looking at the comparison chart it is hardly surprising that we lag so far behind in Commerical income. We receive far less money from our shirt sponsor (Chang) and kit manufacturer (Umbro) than any of the other 6. Then add in the fact that we have sold the right for our merchandising and retail operations to Kitbag in exchange for a flat 3 million pounds a year profit, royalties from sales, and a town center retail outlet owned and operated by Kitbag.

Now the first two sources of income(Sponsor and Kit Manufacturer) are inherently tied to the last (Kitbag retail) as outside of the market penetration and visibility that we receive as a result of international broadcasting the next most visible tool we have for building brand awareness and reaching foreign markets is through the kits.

That means that moving forward, given that increasing commercial income is a priority and an opportunity to be exploited, I believe we are going to see that Kitbag deal ended before it is due to run its course in 2019.

When we signed the kitbag deal we were in a tenuous financial position given the restrictions Barclays was placing upon us regarding our use of an overdraft account. We had previously lost money on merchandising for a whole number of reasons, poor forecasting of demand leading to unsold stock being the largest of them. We also lacked the finances to be able to invest in opening a new club store in Liverpool One and required the Kitbag deal in order to do so. One of the major reasons the Kitbag deal was signed was because it took the risks associated with managing a retail operation and placed them into the lap of Kitbag. The thing about risks in business is that they are usually a reflection of an opportunity (the worst-case scenarios versus the best-case), sticking with this Kitbag deal has become a missed opportunity.

With Moshiri's takeover we are no longer hamstrung by our inability to invest in growing our operations and we are better able to accommodate the risks that are inherent in a retailing operation. Given that Moshiri made his money as a management consultant for Deloitte (and later Usmanov), I would be willing to bet that Moshiri knows the right people with the right expertise to manage a retail operation on a global scale such as Everton's would be. So now that we have the financial ability to accommodate those risks and access to the management expertise required to properly forecast demand and manage inventory I would hope that Moshiri will be seeking to end this deal prematurely and to capitalize on this opportunity. I believe that, if properly managed, we could see profits for this sector of Everton's commercial income greatly exceed the 3 million allowance in the accounts currently.


Regaining control of the retail and merchandising operations is to be seen as vital in marketing the club and growing our brand globally. One of the first things new fans here in North America do is buy the shirt to show off their support for the team and we should be exploiting that opportunity as much as possible and reaping the profits and benefits for ourselves.


Further, if we do get rid of Kitbag and manage to outperform their sales figures by moving retailing and merchandising in house we will see increased in the Sponsorship and Kit Manufacturer deals in turn grow to reflect the larger value of Everton's increased market penetration in global markets.
 
Good stuff Esk, the comparison chart really goes some way to displaying how far off we are from competing financially with those teams.

When looking at the comparison chart it is hardly surprising that we lag so far behind in Commerical income. We receive far less money from our shirt sponsor (Chang) and kit manufacturer (Umbro) than any of the other 6. Then add in the fact that we have sold the right for our merchandising and retail operations to Kitbag in exchange for a flat 3 million pounds a year profit, royalties from sales, and a town center retail outlet owned and operated by Kitbag.

Now the first two sources of income(Sponsor and Kit Manufacturer) are inherently tied to the last (Kitbag retail) as outside of the market penetration and visibility that we receive as a result of international broadcasting the next most visible tool we have for building brand awareness and reaching foreign markets is through the kits.

That means that moving forward, given that increasing commercial income is a priority and an opportunity to be exploited, I believe we are going to see that Kitbag deal ended before it is due to run its course in 2019.

When we signed the kitbag deal we were in a tenuous financial position given the restrictions Barclays was placing upon us regarding our use of an overdraft account. We had previously lost money on merchandising for a whole number of reasons, poor forecasting of demand leading to unsold stock being the largest of them. We also lacked the finances to be able to invest in opening a new club store in Liverpool One and required the Kitbag deal in order to do so. One of the major reasons the Kitbag deal was signed was because it took the risks associated with managing a retail operation and placed them into the lap of Kitbag. The thing about risks in business is that they are usually a reflection of an opportunity (the worst-case scenarios versus the best-case), sticking with this Kitbag deal has become a missed opportunity.

With Moshiri's takeover we are no longer hamstrung by our inability to invest in growing our operations and we are better able to accommodate the risks that are inherent in a retailing operation. Given that Moshiri made his money as a management consultant for Deloitte (and later Usmanov), I would be willing to bet that Moshiri knows the right people with the right expertise to manage a retail operation on a global scale such as Everton's would be. So now that we have the financial ability to accommodate those risks and access to the management expertise required to properly forecast demand and manage inventory I would hope that Moshiri will be seeking to end this deal prematurely and to capitalize on this opportunity. I believe that, if properly managed, we could see profits for this sector of Everton's commercial income greatly exceed the 3 million allowance in the accounts currently.


Regaining control of the retail and merchandising operations is to be seen as vital in marketing the club and growing our brand globally. One of the first things new fans here in North America do is buy the shirt to show off their support for the team and we should be exploiting that opportunity as much as possible and reaping the profits and benefits for ourselves.


Further, if we do get rid of Kitbag and manage to outperform their sales figures by moving retailing and merchandising in house we will see increased in the Sponsorship and Kit Manufacturer deals in turn grow to reflect the larger value of Everton's increased market penetration in global markets.

Very good post mate, I agree entirely - every aspect of the club's revenue raising operations need wholesale review and change.

That requires change at the top.
 
Very good post mate, I agree entirely - every aspect of the club's revenue raising operations need wholesale review and change.

That requires change at the top.


I want them to very badly bring the merchandising and retail operations back in house, so I can apply for a job doing it.
 
Latest front page article:


Had a look and an interesting read.
Probably get castigated but it doesn't really compare like with like.
Kitbag/Sodexo deals are profit figures, not turnover figures so in the interests of a fair comparison both figures received would have to be reverse-engineered to compute a reasonable turnover figure. Obviously this assumes that none of the listed teams have similar outsourcing arrangements to EFC.
Matchday income shows the lack of corporates and it should also be taken into account that certain clubs limit the supply of season tickets therefore reaping rewards from selling more full price tickets. Should also be noted that due to the Pru Trustees loan, it is probable that an internal market for hospitality seats is in operation, so we probably include the seat only in our matchday plus Sodexo contribution. GPSL accounts give the seat only amount.
Our commercial deals are poor, but City are distorted by the sponsorships from associated companies, and the others (except Spurs)are generated because of global brand awareness which nowadays can only be acheived by success. (Stating the bleeding obvious, I know)
Oh, and the EFC turnover doesn't cross-cast by 10 mil and some of the others are out by 1 mil
So rubbish as we are, it could be worse!
 

Had a look and an interesting read.
Probably get castigated but it doesn't really compare like with like.
Kitbag/Sodexo deals are profit figures, not turnover figures so in the interests of a fair comparison both figures received would have to be reverse-engineered to compute a reasonable turnover figure. Obviously this assumes that none of the listed teams have similar outsourcing arrangements to EFC.
Matchday income shows the lack of corporates and it should also be taken into account that certain clubs limit the supply of season tickets therefore reaping rewards from selling more full price tickets. Should also be noted that due to the Pru Trustees loan, it is probable that an internal market for hospitality seats is in operation, so we probably include the seat only in our matchday plus Sodexo contribution. GPSL accounts give the seat only amount.
Our commercial deals are poor, but City are distorted by the sponsorships from associated companies, and the others (except Spurs)are generated because of global brand awareness which nowadays can only be acheived by success. (Stating the bleeding obvious, I know)
Oh, and the EFC turnover doesn't cross-cast by 10 mil and some of the others are out by 1 mil
So rubbish as we are, it could be worse!

Hi mate, I'm aware of the differences in treatment of the various income streams across clubs and it's quite a task to compare like with like figures from published accounts.

The figures are intended to illustrate the scale of the task ahead, the effect of doing nothing, possible solutions and utimately the political statement that to compete,or even get close to competing we, in my opinion, need wholesale change at board and executive levels.

Appreciate your comments ;);)
 
What is Moshiri goals for our club?

-PL survival or the PL title
-Net spend of £20m or £100m
-Goodison Park or a new ground
-Global Brand or Selected markets
-World class business execution or mgt efficiency
etc

It,s time we found out.

No its not. Not on Moshiri time. Wrong again , Cribby .
 
Had a look and an interesting read.
Probably get castigated but it doesn't really compare like with like.
Kitbag/Sodexo deals are profit figures, not turnover figures so in the interests of a fair comparison both figures received would have to be reverse-engineered to compute a reasonable turnover figure. Obviously this assumes that none of the listed teams have similar outsourcing arrangements to EFC.
Matchday income shows the lack of corporates and it should also be taken into account that certain clubs limit the supply of season tickets therefore reaping rewards from selling more full price tickets. Should also be noted that due to the Pru Trustees loan, it is probable that an internal market for hospitality seats is in operation, so we probably include the seat only in our matchday plus Sodexo contribution. GPSL accounts give the seat only amount.
Our commercial deals are poor, but City are distorted by the sponsorships from associated companies, and the others (except Spurs)are generated because of global brand awareness which nowadays can only be acheived by success. (Stating the bleeding obvious, I know)
Oh, and the EFC turnover doesn't cross-cast by 10 mil and some of the others are out by 1 mil
So rubbish as we are, it could be worse!


That's a good point as far as the comparison goes. Though I do feel like we could be making more money than the 3 million flat from Kitbag with retail deals despite not having the global brand awareness of the others. I honestly don't understand how Spurs became fashionable over in North America, I put it down to the timing of when they snagged their 4th-placed finish being a period of massive growth for US-TV exposure.
 
Good stuff Esk, the comparison chart really goes some way to displaying how far off we are from competing financially with those teams.

When looking at the comparison chart it is hardly surprising that we lag so far behind in Commerical income. We receive far less money from our shirt sponsor (Chang) and kit manufacturer (Umbro) than any of the other 6. Then add in the fact that we have sold the right for our merchandising and retail operations to Kitbag in exchange for a flat 3 million pounds a year profit, royalties from sales, and a town center retail outlet owned and operated by Kitbag.

Now the first two sources of income(Sponsor and Kit Manufacturer) are inherently tied to the last (Kitbag retail) as outside of the market penetration and visibility that we receive as a result of international broadcasting the next most visible tool we have for building brand awareness and reaching foreign markets is through the kits.

That means that moving forward, given that increasing commercial income is a priority and an opportunity to be exploited, I believe we are going to see that Kitbag deal ended before it is due to run its course in 2019.

When we signed the kitbag deal we were in a tenuous financial position given the restrictions Barclays was placing upon us regarding our use of an overdraft account. We had previously lost money on merchandising for a whole number of reasons, poor forecasting of demand leading to unsold stock being the largest of them. We also lacked the finances to be able to invest in opening a new club store in Liverpool One and required the Kitbag deal in order to do so. One of the major reasons the Kitbag deal was signed was because it took the risks associated with managing a retail operation and placed them into the lap of Kitbag. The thing about risks in business is that they are usually a reflection of an opportunity (the worst-case scenarios versus the best-case), sticking with this Kitbag deal has become a missed opportunity.

With Moshiri's takeover we are no longer hamstrung by our inability to invest in growing our operations and we are better able to accommodate the risks that are inherent in a retailing operation. Given that Moshiri made his money as a management consultant for Deloitte (and later Usmanov), I would be willing to bet that Moshiri knows the right people with the right expertise to manage a retail operation on a global scale such as Everton's would be. So now that we have the financial ability to accommodate those risks and access to the management expertise required to properly forecast demand and manage inventory I would hope that Moshiri will be seeking to end this deal prematurely and to capitalize on this opportunity. I believe that, if properly managed, we could see profits for this sector of Everton's commercial income greatly exceed the 3 million allowance in the accounts currently.


Regaining control of the retail and merchandising operations is to be seen as vital in marketing the club and growing our brand globally. One of the first things new fans here in North America do is buy the shirt to show off their support for the team and we should be exploiting that opportunity as much as possible and reaping the profits and benefits for ourselves.


Further, if we do get rid of Kitbag and manage to outperform their sales figures by moving retailing and merchandising in house we will see increased in the Sponsorship and Kit Manufacturer deals in turn grow to reflect the larger value of Everton's increased market penetration in global markets.

Commercial Revenue.

That lagging behind our competitors has time and again been discussed on here @Neiler and @The Esk are probably sick of talking about it.

But he's right as per.

We really need to ensure that the club are not making excuses. Robert Elstone is a disgrace for saying 'Everton cannot be compared to other clubs'.

Really Robert?

Really? :coffee:

Small time thinking.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top