Everton Accounts Released

[Deleted member 28206]

Shouldn't you be stalking people's family members mate ?

Is this a request?

 

[Bruce Wayne]

A worry that wages/turnover is now 75%. That's not a good number at all.

As for the loss, considering wages rose £5.5 million, and turnover was down £2 million, that's £7.5 million right there.

 

[Allezfan]

A worry that wages/turnover is now 75%. That's not a good number at all.

As for the loss, considering wages rose £5.5 million, and turnover was down £2 million, that's £7.5 million right there.

Yeah take off the 1.2 million we earned through sponsorship and less OOC and you're only talking 2.6 million of that loss that needs to be accounted for and that could easily be interest or agents or what have you. It's not a big mystery.

 

[Ihaters]

A worry that wages/turnover is now 75%. That's not a good number at all.

As for the loss, considering wages rose £5.5 million, and turnover was down £2 million, that's £7.5 million right there.

This new sky money couldn't come at a better time

 

[Baines' left foot]

Well this is a bit depressing.

I'm in a good mood today though so I think I'll swifty do one.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

I think we need to get away from the notion that Sky money is a panacea. If you look at our wages as a percentage of turnover figure, it is rising year on year, despite turnover largely rising.

In other words wages are rising faster than turnover is, despite things like Sky income going up hugely over the past decade.

All of which largely means that most Sky money goes directly into players pockets.

 

[Allezfan]

The league needs a wage cap.

 

[Blackwatch1878]

Yippie!

Elstone will blame the fans again

He will probably say its because we dont sell the obstructed seats at the very back of the main , but yeah he will hint at it being the fans fault somewere he always does

 

[kenada_blue]

I think we need to get away from the notion that Sky money is a panacea. If you look at our wages as a percentage of turnover figure, it is rising year on year, despite turnover largely rising.

In other words wages are rising faster than turnover is, despite things like Sky income going up hugely over the past decade.

All of which largely means that most Sky money goes directly into players pockets.

Does it take into account getting big earners like Arteta and Yakubu off the bill?

 

[Essex Blue]

Aren't these accounts for the period up to May 2011?

The sale of Arteta etc isn't included, and neither is the purchase of Jelavic and Gibson?

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Does it take into account getting big earners like Arteta and Yakubu off the bill?

Yes. Wages rose by around £5.5 million.

 

[Essex Blue]

Yes. Wages rose by around £5.5 million.

Can somebody clarify what period these accounts are for?

I was under the impression that they relate to the period before we sold Arteta and Yakubu etc?

 

[Brennan]

Can somebody clarify what period these accounts are for?

I was under the impression that they relate to the period before we sold Arteta and Yakubu etc?

1st June 2011 - 31st May 2012

 

[Bruce Wayne]

The accounts are for the year ending the 31st May 2012

http://www.evertonfc.com/assets/_fi...1357208599_Everton_Financial_Accounts_201.pdf

 

[steviejaffa]

the sales of yakubu, arteta etc are included. as are the purchases of jelavic, gibson, pienaar etc