The evidence is there. 2-0 Denmark tomorrow, streets awash with red faced crying st George's types.Where have you got this from?
The evidence is there. 2-0 Denmark tomorrow, streets awash with red faced crying st George's types.Where have you got this from?
Because you didn’t say that. You said we’d get a drubbing.
I said we COULD get a drubbing
Could doesn't mean we will
I think we’ll probably concede our first goal tomorrowI said we COULD get a drubbing
Could doesn't mean we will
The evidence is there. 2-0 Denmark tomorrow, streets awash with red faced crying st George's types.
But you can’t see the future anyway so of course it’s not a would.
They’ve managed to lose twice, have their star player nearly die on the pitch and be in the semis. Some going, that.How?? They haven’t beaten anyone at all in this tournament?
So why are we even arguing then?
We could get drubbed, we could drub them, it could be a nervy 0-0 followed by pens, or Denmark could beat us
Based off this game I think both of these teams would match up very well with England
Again, I see no reason why that's a controversial opinion to have
There's every chance that Spain could play like this and tear us apart like warm bread
Beating a Ukraine team that went 1-1-3, and no one else that advanced beyond the round of 16 while drawing Scotland and playing all games at home aside from the aforementioned Ukraine at home just doesn’t look as impressive as you seem to want it to. If you think England are better than these two sides, you have a chance to prove it.So we have to win the whole tournament to stop being underrated? Strange way of looking at things. These two haven’t beaten anyone better than Germany.
So it’s gone from ‘possible drubbing’ to ‘just might be better’?I'm not sure what's controversial about saying that Spain and Italy just might be better teams than England tbh