I can vouch for this part of the account. The father of one of my staff, Steve Sharp, was the Liverpool supporter stabbed after the game. It was a hell-and-all time for Steve. A mate, Ian Miller, who worked in another Liverpool office was attacked by an Italian swinging a bicycle chain, and he said the only reason it did not wrap around his throat was because he raised his arm and manged to block it. He showed me the marks/scars of it. He said the Italian Police just stood by and let the Italian fans attack the Liverpool fans.
I write the above in no defence whatsoever with regards to events at Heysel. Simply to tell the story of what I know and heard at the time of events in Rome. If you want to know where I worked at the time, I'll be happy to give you further details.
It doesn't really matter what happened in Rome, does it?
Heysel was in another country, in another time, against a team which was not Roma.
For Dalglish to use events in Rome several years before as some sort of excuse for the murderous antics of his fans in Belgiium is disgusting.
It is a phenomenon which abounded in Nothern Ireland throughout the Troubles and is known as "whataboutery".
If one side committed an atrocity against the other, rather than face the shame of it, many on the side committing the atrocity would try to contextualise it by saying "ah, but what about what happened at......" (insert an atrocity which the other side had inflicted on your mob).
Of course, the official RS "memorial" to Heysel, a little plaque nailed on to a wall, states the "39 football fans lost their lives when a wall collapsed".
It doesn't mention the fact that the fans were Juventus fans and that the wall collapsed because of the rampage of Liverpool fans.
And it goes on to lament the fact that thousands of Kopites had their trip ruined by watching so meant oeopke due in front of them.
So Dalglish is voicing what LFC believes about Heysel at the very highest level.
A despicable football club.








