Erm, the need for penalties literally means there’s been no winner in the actual game?Are you honestly trying to suggest that winning on penalties somehow doesn’t mean you’ve won the game?
Erm, the need for penalties literally means there’s been no winner in the actual game?Are you honestly trying to suggest that winning on penalties somehow doesn’t mean you’ve won the game?
Thank god the title race can't be won on a penalty shoot out.FFS, the first two legs of the Quad have been achieved without scoring a goal in 120 minutes against the same team. They’re well practised on pens courtesy of the PL refs, so there you go. Hopefully City see them off in the league, and Madrid whup them in the CL.
Erm then winning the penalty shootout means you’ve won the game?Erm, the need for penalties literally means there’s been no winner in the actual game?
You say that, but they’ve had more than their fair share…Thank god the title race can't be won on a penalty shoot out.
Fixed itGuy Mowbray is hands down the biggest public schoolboy kopite bellwhiff going…
No, it means you’ve won the penalty shoot out.Erm then winning the penalty shootout means you’ve won the game?
Which wins you the game, which in turn gets your name put on a cup, which goes down in the record books as a win, which gets you a parade because you won.No, it means you’ve won the penalty shoot out.
That’s an absolute stretchErm, the need for penalties literally means there’s been no winner in the actual game?
And we demand justice for the 39.Can't believe they rigged the coin toss to have penalties at the Chelsea end. Disgrace that. I demand justice.
7 now.How many pots is that by penalties now.