So you're prejudiced then. You've proved it. I'm awaiting the written decision before making any judgements. Isn't that what an open-minded person would do? You've offered nothing by way of evidence, not stated which rules have been broken and why, and not given any regard to the evidence offered by City in their defence and/or in mitigation. I'm not sure stating "you're well dodgy, it's embarrassing" carries much weight in litigation. I'll restate: I genuinely don't know what the outcome will be. Neither do you.