I think you could also ask it the other way around? The ref gave fury a 15 count in the last round and a UK ref would have stopped it as soon as he hit the deck
A 15 count lol
I think you could also ask it the other way around? The ref gave fury a 15 count in the last round and a UK ref would have stopped it as soon as he hit the deck
What does throwing 100 less have to do with it if he’s landed 13 more? If anything that just proves how terribly inaccurate Wilder is
I’ve said I don’t think it’s a robbery. The 115-111 card is a joke though. That means he had the fight level if you discount the knockdowns. If you think that’s fair then I can’t even argue with youDo you think a boxer is robbed if he throws 13 more punches and is decked twice? I certainly don't.
I’ve said I don’t think it’s a robbery. The 115-111 card is a joke though. That means he had the fight level if you discount the knockdowns. If you think that’s fair then I can’t even argue with you
Hence why stats are misleading, wilder could have thrown 80% of his punches in the 2 rounds he knocked Fury down hypotheticallyDo you think a boxer is robbed if he throws 13 more punches and is decked twice? I certainly don't.
What work though? He wasn’t landing anything, was barely jabbing and despite throwing 100 punches more than Fury landed 13 less. He’s a big puncher, massive infact but a fairly average boxer.I've already said wilder is really hard to score as people miss most of his work. But the stats show it was a close fight punch wise
So hitting thin air with inaccurate windmilling gets you points in your opinion?Do you think a boxer is robbed if he throws 13 more punches and is decked twice? I certainly don't.
Hence why stats are misleading, wilder could have thrown 80% of his punches in the 2 rounds he knocked Fury down hypothetically
So hitting thin air with inaccurate windmilling gets you points in your opinion?
Exactly why stats are misleading. And boxing is subjective, personally I think fury won it comfortably even getting sparked twiceYeah and fury could have thrown all his in 3 rounds.
The stats show it was a close fight. The robbery shouts are way over the top
Exactly why stats are misleading. And boxing is subjective, personally I think fury won it comfortably even getting sparked twice
That's not what I asked, you mentioned Wilder throwing 100more but landing 13 less...that to me is aimless windmilling, like when a keeper dives full length for a shot going wide, purely for the camerasConnecting with 70 punches does
Haha yeah, be nice to be able to say "what a great fight" once in a while, its always controversial.Look i understand boxing is subjective but I can't see how someone won comfortably by landing on average a punch a round more whisky getting dropped twice.
Boxing hey?
I didn’t see the full fight but just seen the knock down. He hits the canvas with 2:21 on the clock and the ref is still holding it off at 2:01 when the clip ends. You definitely have a point.Not really. He was up at around 9 and was leaning all over the ref. This nonsense about him not getting a decision in the us etc. If that had happened in the UK it wouldn't have even gone to the cards!