How do they maintain their peg?
Yes. And that ‘commodity’ is the USD. So for all intents and purposes you are getting an asset that is impacted by exactly the same factors as fiat (relative growth, interest rate differentials, valuations, trade and capital flows).Commodity-backed
The main characteristics of backed stablecoins are:
- Their value is fixed to one or more commodities and redeemable for such (more or less) on demand,
- There is a promise to pay, by unregulated individuals, agorist firms, or even regulated financial institutions,
- The amount of commodity used to back the stablecoin has to reflect the circulating supply of the stablecoin.
Isn’t Tether the most popular dollar stablecoin? Despite some very questionable practices and dubious reserves if anyone tried to redeem it for actual dollars?There are very Stable Coins tagged to the Dollar. At the moment you can get over 7% interest on such Coins. Very stable whilst you get less than 1% on your £ in your Bank Account.
At present I'm getting anything from 77% to over 11% on some of my investments (Compound interest too)
You can redeem it for £s if you want to.Isn’t Tether the most popular dollar stablecoin? Despite some very questionable practices and dubious reserves if anyone tried to redeem it for actual dollars?
Tether Limited formerly falsely[4] claimed that each token was backed by one United States dollar, but on 14 March 2019 changed the backing to include loans to affiliate companies.[5][6] The Bitfinex exchange was the subject of a lawsuit by the New York Attorney General of using Tether's funds to cover up $850 million in funds missing since mid-2018.[7][8] The investigation found that iFinex — the operator of Bitfinex and Tether — made false statements about the backing of the Tether and about the movement of hundreds of millions of dollars between the two companies to cover up the truth about massive losses by Bitfinex. According to the New York Attorney General, "Tether’s claims that its virtual currency was fully backed by U.S. dollars at all times was a lie".[4]Tether (cryptocurrency) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You can get 5% for GBP.Yes. And that ‘commodity’ is the USD. So for all intents and purposes you are getting an asset that is impacted by exactly the same factors as fiat (relative growth, interest rate differentials, valuations, trade and capital flows).
Yes, you are getting 7% but the differential is essentially credit risk - the crypto isn’t backed by a guarantor in the same way as the USD is.
That 7% will also look less attractive as rates start to rise so will need to increase when that happens. Which will reduce the existing value of the coin on a relative basis (or the peg will need to be broken).
It’s not easy to peg a currency when there is a shift in monetary conditions. We are at the top of a cycle for that at the moment.
I’m not denying the returns are good. I understand the differential between short term rates and what crypto pays. But it’s not equivalent. For a start, you are backed by the FSCS up to £85k on a bank account. You don’t have the same recourse in crypto.You can get 5% for GBP.
At the moment you get less than 1% in a bank.
How long do you think your money in the bank will be earning 5%.?
Months.. 1 year.. 3 years.. 5 yrs or more.?
Take your pick.
It isn’t the specific currency that really matters though - it is if they have the resources to meet any requests to convert back to fiat. And whilst In theory you can redeem, in practice they really have very little cash on hand if there was a increase in people wanting to convert and they haven’t exactly got a pristine reputation for honesty.You can redeem it for £s if you want to.
The assertion is Circle holding enough USD to cover for the USDC token they have issued. But there is a bit of a word salad in the report.Circle Internet Financial, Inc.’s management is responsible for its assertion.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Reserve Account Information in the accompanying Reserve Account Report based on our examination.
In 2008 pre crash I thought the housing and stock market a bit frothy so raised a lot of cash and Schwab had a money market fund that they marketed as being safe but with a little extra yield.I’m not denying the returns are good. I understand the differential between short term rates and what crypto pays. But it’s not equivalent. For a start, you are backed by the FSCS up to £85k on a bank account. You don’t have the same recourse in crypto.
You can about 9% on a HY bond. But there are risks associated with that.
You get 7% on ‘cash’ for crypto because there are additional risk premia associated with the investment. That’s it.
All the cash funds had the same issue!In 2008 pre crash I thought the housing and stock market a bit frothy so raised a lot of cash and Schwab had a money market fund that they marketed as being safe but with a little extra yield.
Turned out the way the supposedly “safe” fund was getting that extra yield by using mortgage bonds which then promptly blew up - thankfully I was able to sell very early on as was reading some clued in commentators but many weren’t as lucky.
![]()
Charles Schwab settles SEC allegations that it misled investors about risks of bond fund
Charles Schwab settles SEC allegations that it misled investors about risks of bond fundwww.latimes.com
No such thing as a few lunch...
that is your opinion but i seriously doubt it will happen. the governments of the world are in money printing mode, have no intention of changing course and need interest rates low in order to maintain the charade.All the cash funds had the same issue!
They were paying 5% back then, daily liquidity. People forget that those kinda rates were the norm. And that we’ve been in an unprecedented low rate environment that will start to reverse from here.
You bitcoin folks are basically superheroes kev