Fitz outThat was just a missive designed to be enjoyed by the Kenwrong brigade (though it does contain a lot of truths, albeit well known ones to anyone who has read Toffeeweb ), but some of the calls for "Everton supporters need to start showing some of the passion seen across the park" can quite frankly just do one, they have embarrassed themselves utterly since SoS and their ilk came into being and the last thing we should ever do is to imitate them.
The problem we have is of course that while Kenwrong is as described in Fitz's article, he exists in a sport that is packed full of similar types, saying similar things, many of whom are far worse than he is and who would be correspondingly be far worse for us as a club.
So BK is secretly a Red and colluding with the RS to insure that they'll always be the bigger club? Worse yet he was the 15th hijacker.
I guess if you read the nonsense on toffeeweb enough you actually start to believe it.
what do you suggest Dave ?
that he sells out to some conglomerate of snake oil salesmen, that can just about scrape together the funds to say 'I'm in" and then look to recoup their layout before anything else ?
As for 'showing the passion seen across the park,' is he havin' a feckin' laugh ?
He's no doubt one of these that sat in the pub with them, talking about football quarters and self elevating themselves to the role of 'voice of the peoples club,' when in fact the majority wish they'd go on a cruise with dayouneon in the Bermuda Triangle.
Mr Kenwright publicly endorsed the proposed recent move to Kirkby whilst just a few years earlier he sought to undermined his then chairman, Peter Johnson, by covertly financing the activities of the Goodison For Everton [GFE] group who were opposed to Johnson's original Kirkby relocation plans
However, Mr. Fitz also represents a certain verbal exchange thus:Bill Kenwright was the person responsible for overseeing the advance spending of the never-to-materialise NTL media money which was wasted on abysmal signings such as Alex Nyarko
Here is the transcript of the verbal exchange in question, taken from the keioc website (underline – mine):…the chairman, Bill Kenwright, immaturely refused to answer a question concerning the sale of the club whilst verbally abusing the shareholder for asking a perfectly legitimate question about a business to which he had a financial as well as emotional stake. This shareholder has subsequently relinquished his shareholding in disgust of the chairman and his arrogant attitude and actions towards minor shareholders.
I invite everyone to draw their own conclusions about the truthfulness of Mr. Fitz’s statements. The defence rests, M’lud.QUESTION FROM A SHAREHOLDER…
“Looking at the record turnover…most of it from TV rights…the core business, the commercial side, stayed the same, slightly backwards; you say we’re punching above our weight how long can we go on without investment…I hear every week…I read the paper and there’s club’s being bought…if you’re looking 24/7 why haven’t we found someone……… Is one of the reasons no on has come in for Everton is that the board are asking for too much money?
Bill Kenwright…
“No”
SAME SHAREHOLDER…
“Some clubs have consortiums bidding for these clubs… Peter Trembling former commercial director, recently left the club, we’ll never find out why, within three or four months of leaving he found investors…middle east based…to buy Notts County………if Everton are for sale how much are you asking for the club?
Bill Kenwright:
“Here we go…oh please………come on”
SHAREHOLDER:
“You’re not answering the question…”
Bill Kenwright:
“I’m not answering your question…I’m bored with your question…you’re not getting an answer to the question.”
The reason why I’m defending Kenwright is because I, like everyone else, vicariously run the football club in my head, and without hindsight, there really isn’t a lot that I would have done differently at the time – not to mention that the things I would have done probably would have sent a pitchfork and torch wielding mob of Evertonians to my door. I would also like to point out that the precariousness of our position has very little to do with Bill Kenwright’s management (or lack thereof). Ultimately, I have yet to see any evidence that Kenwright has made any money from his investement in Everton, that he has diverted any available financial resources from squad building (perhaps excluding the “untold many millions of pounds” designated for Kirkby… oh, wait, it was 4 millions of pounds… doesn’t have the same ring, does it, Mr. Fitz?) or that he’s ever turned down a legitimate investor.[Everton is currently] in a more vulnerable position than when he took control
It's grim. We've got people on the board and outside it with more than enough money to take us forward if they were interested, but they're not. And they wont shift themselves until they get a pay-off worth their wait. They'll just sit on this situation and roll with it. Pacifying the natives is the key to that strategy. Midtable is ok for them; winning nothing is ok for them too. They just want to wait and see what happens - another 'enabling scheme' to latch onto when the economy bucks up; the possibility of tv revenues improving as variuous streams and payment structures work their way through. In the meantime there'll be no marquee signings and there'll be more sales.
This is the future according to the prognosis in that article and it's one I agree with.
Say what you will about our favorite kenwronger Davek, but at least he's more or less intellectually honest. The fecklessness of this puerile diatribe makes me wonder if in two or three years keioc-ers are going to add “failed to secure our future by building Kirkby” to the list of Kenwright’s faults, imagined or real. What some of the people around Mr. Fitz were saying about the King’s Dock project when it actually was on the table (that we were being burdened with an overwhelming amount of debt for a “pie in the sky” project – not that I’m saying that they were necessarily wrong) really jibes with their current position. I struggle to recall a lot of enthusiasm for P&A Gregg’s proposed takeover (given Gregg’s later involvement with football, the skepticism was completely justified).
Since this was before my time, can anybody shed more light on these claims:
However, Mr. Fitz also represents a certain verbal exchange thus:
Here is the transcript of the verbal exchange in question, taken from the keioc website (underline – mine):
I invite everyone to draw their own conclusions about the truthfulness of Mr. Fitz’s statements. The defence rests, M’lud.
Of course, the fact that Keioc are dishonest – is this really news - does not make Mr. Kenwright pure as the driven snow (FSF, for instance, is very hard to excuse). In 2-12 weeks time we will have the club’s accounts for the 2009/2010 season and we will have more insight about the state we are in and the prospects for the future, however it may very well be that
The reason why I’m defending Kenwright is because I, like everyone else, vicariously run the football club in my head, and without hindsight, there really isn’t a lot that I would have done differently at the time – not to mention that the things I would have done probably would have sent a pitchfork and torch wielding mob of Evertonians to my door. I would also like to point out that the precariousness of our position has very little to do with Bill Kenwright’s management (or lack thereof). Ultimately, I have yet to see any evidence that Kenwright has made any money from his investement in Everton, that he has diverted any available financial resources from squad building (perhaps excluding the “untold many millions of pounds” designated for Kirkby… oh, wait, it was 4 millions of pounds… doesn’t have the same ring, does it, Mr. Fitz?) or that he’s ever turned down a legitimate investor.