Is the correct answer. Both hugely intelligent players who play for the team, not youtube clipsI used to say it about Pienaar, and now I'll say it about Bernard:
Anyone who doesn't rate him probably chips the ball into the corners in five-a-side.
Is the correct answer. Both hugely intelligent players who play for the team, not youtube clipsI used to say it about Pienaar, and now I'll say it about Bernard:
Anyone who doesn't rate him probably chips the ball into the corners in five-a-side.
The thing with some American sports, like Baseball and American Football is they involve a lot of set plays which are analysed in isolation. Football is a fluid game which has elements that are very difficult or impossible to measure.
For example (and to the best of my knowledge) it’s not possible to make a stat for how a player receives a ball in a tight area under pressure, turns away from his man and releases the ball to a teammate, but it’s a priceless trait for a footballer to have. Gomes and Bernard are excellent at this (as was Pienaar) and it’s no coincidence that they’re two of the players most criticised by people who use stats to support an argument.
it’s not possible to make a stat for how a player receives a ball in a tight area under pressure, turns away from his man and releases the ball to a teammate, but it’s a priceless trait for a footballer to have. Gomes and Bernard are excellent at this (as was Pienaar) and it’s no coincidence that they’re two of the players most criticised by people who use stats to support an argument.
For example (and to the best of my knowledge) it’s not possible to make a stat for how a player receives a ball in a tight area under pressure, turns away from his man and releases the ball to a teammate, but it’s a priceless trait for a footballer to have. Gomes and Bernard are excellent at this (as was Pienaar) and it’s no coincidence that they’re two of the players most criticised by people who use stats to support an argument.
The only stat I really care about is how many points Everton have.Or a stat for hounding an opposition into a mistake/non-optimal pass/delayed enough to set the defence. Sometimes you don't need 4.7 tackles per game to put you in the league high group if you are constantly making a nuisance of yourself, and for a diminutive winger that is about as much as you can ask.
I'd just rather judge with my own eyes, if we were to judge by stats alone you could have some players deliberately picking up the ball in strange ass places to be able to beat/dribble past a non-tackling centre forward or crossing from impossible angles to nobody in particular. Or they save all their energy to put in a real shift against teams they know they can dominate, safe in the knowledge that if they post decent numbers (even if you divide those by 4) they still look good enough so they don't have to worry so much against the best teams.
I used to say it about Pienaar, and now I'll say it about Bernard:
Anyone who doesn't rate him probably chips the ball into the corners in five-a-side.