Andrew

RufusCat said:
The internet/google says it's 17?
Click to expand...
It is 17 in New York state. Some have remarked that the age of consent in the UK is 16, which is correct, but I'd say it's a glib or crass defence.

He was in NYC, knew the laws and as such those laws were upheld. In the UK, consent may be 16, but coercion or victim trafficking are illegal.

Anyone under the age of 18 in the UK, where there's an exchange of money or financial/product gain, is considered to have exploited, and as such illegal.

If Epstein and Co. did such acts in the UK, they would likely be facing a lengthy custodial sentences.
 
Last edited:

davek said:
:lol:

View attachment 331161
Click to expand...
The odd one with this Dave is, if there's one in the royal family who should be able to wear the uniform, it's him if it is not Harry or William.

The first two (especially Andrew) have seen active service. Still, I'm digressing from the real issue that he's suspected of being a sexual deviant...

...,so I ain't going to be giving him much sympathy.
 
PhilM said:
The odd one with this Dave is, if there's one in the royal family who should be able to wear the uniform, it's him if it is not Harry or William.

The first two (especially Andrew) have seen active service. Still, I'm digressing from the real issue that he's suspected of being a sexual deviant...

...,so I ain't going to be giving him much sympathy.
Click to expand...
Chocolate soldiers.

They'd have been kept well away from enemy fire.
 
davek said:
Chocolate soldiers.

They'd have been kept well away from enemy fire.
Click to expand...
Wrong Dave, completely. It's well known that within the forces that he was known as an arrogant tosser, yet he was 100% involved in the Falklands.

This included being a diversion against further attacks on the Atlantic Conveyor, amongst many other actions.

By all means, have a go at him for most things, but not the above.
 

PhilM said:
Wrong Dave, completely. It's well known that within the forces that he was known as an arrogant tosser, yet he was 100% involved in the Falklands.

This included being a diversion against further attacks on the Atlantic Conveyor, amongst many other actions.

By all means, have a go at him for most things, but not the above.
Click to expand...

He'd have been sent well out of range from anything the Argentine navy could throw at them.

Same with the ginger lad. No way he was fighting the Taliban. They probably had footage of him shooting at an Elstree studio back lot.
 
davek said:
He'd have been sent well out of range from anything the Argentine navy could throw at them.

Same with the ginger lad. No way he was fighting the Taliban. They probably had footage of him shooting at an Elstree studio back lot.
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
davek said:
Same with the ginger lad. No way he was fighting the Taliban. They probably had footage of him shooting at an Elstree studio back lot.
Click to expand...
Not true actually. He was serving in a highly active area for a while during his infantry days, before the media grassed his location up and he was moved from there as he was a target and would have endangered his colleagues.

After that he was hovering around in his death copter, gunning down goat herders from several thousand foot up, so swings n roundabouts.
 
LostLegend said:
Not true actually. He was serving in a highly active area for a while during his infantry days, before the media grassed his location up and he was moved from there as he was a target and would have endangered his colleagues.

After that he was hovering around in his death copter, gunning down goat herders from several thousand foot up, so swings n roundabouts.
Click to expand...


He'd have been worrying goats the traditional way.
 


Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top