agard

Neiler · January 4, 2010

To be fair we have a lot more strikers then at the same point last Jan.

Columbia6 · January 4, 2010

devonblue said:
so why play him when we have agard or baxter on the bench

I would have said this before the game, if we had known of Cahill's injury. However, he was put in because he always has the potential to drag us out of a mess, which he did. Moyes made a perfect call here.

Hayee · January 4, 2010

Robert Jarvis said:
Apparently Cahill in the cup game was carrying an injury.

Moyes wasn't gonna play him but he wanted to play!

bluebastardo · January 4, 2010

With Aggard gone, our reserves will suffer.
If our reserves suffer, then their confidence will dininish. He's worth keeping for that alone.
He has great pace, but needs a bit of coaching regarding finishing the attack.
He won't get that at Everton, so a loan might be good for him, depending on who we loan him to, and the coaches they have there.

Goat · January 4, 2010

Nice bit of fence sitting there lad.

bluebastardo · January 4, 2010

MikelsGoat said:
Nice bit of fence sitting there lad.

Undecided on this one.

Hayee · January 4, 2010

bluebastardo said:
With Aggard gone, our reserves will suffer.
If our reserves suffer, then their confidence will dininish. He's worth keeping for that alone.
He has great pace, but needs a bit of coaching regarding finishing the attack.
He won't get that at Everton, so a loan might be good for him, depending on who we loan him to, and the coaches they have there.

why can't you spell agard?