A semi-serious response; what the blueprint to PL success looks like. In response to the bit in bold, here is the Premier League table for the past 10 years (with this year's results through 36/37 match weeks).
Everton are firmly in "7th", 100 points above the club in 8th. Longevity plays a big factor in this presentation.
Here is the average points total for each club over the past 10 years. It's not entirely surprising. Again, Everton are "7th," behind Liverpool and just ahead of Leicester. What I find remarkable about this presentation is that the "middle clubs" are separated by so little the line appears to have no slope. In this run of clubs are Fulham, Newcastle, Stoke, Swansea, Birmingham, West Ham, Palace, Villa... all clubs who have been relegated (or may barely fight off relegation).
This is the 10 year median points total. Mostly the same, but interesting in that the "top" (United, Chelsea, City) and "bottom" (basically every club below Everton except Southampton) are flat. There is little difference between them. (The distribution
1) Every PL club is the same (including Leicester's Cinderella title), except a few at the top or along the steep path of the curve
2) Only 3 clubs have the economic power to dominate (at the moment), and there is little between them
3) Several clubs are between average and dominant, and could move down but for their constant efforts to ascend the steep slope to success. These are:
Arsenal, who still have considerable economic power but have have been an "average" top team for some time; remains to be seen what happens after Arsene departs, and whether Kroenke will ever spend the money required to win in the current era if they can't find a different/new path to success.
Tottenham, who have been building economic power over the last 10 years, appear to be in position to approach the top. This is built upon the stability of Pochettino, but will Levy spend what is required to contend at the very top?
Liverpool, who are still recovering from the disaster of their prior owners, should have the economic strength to compete near the top level, but maybe not at the level of Chelsea and City, so long as their owners' pocketbooks remain open.
Obviously any of these clubs has a chance to win in any given league competition, but it's unlikely to consider them contenders based on their league history.
So where does Everton fit here, and what is the blueprint for success? It seems that Everton are realistically as close to relegation as they are to reaching the top of the league; they're the only club in limbo at the moment. To progress up the ranks, it requires continued, prolonged investment in the club.
Depending on your view, that may be what we're seeing with Moshiri. Ten years ago isn't far removed from when the club were out of money and Moyes promised there would be no relegation. Since Moshiri has arrived, movement on both the stadium and squad has occurred far more quickly than before. Whether these continue, only time will tell. Only increased investment (or a new pathway forward) will allow Everton to be again an annual contender for the league. If Moshiri closes up his checkbook, we're as likely to see relegation in 10 years as anything else.
I don't want to unfairly trivialize everything else you've written, but it's a bit overambitious and matters so little compared to consistent investment over a long period.
Last edited:
