No need to be Blue, Peter.
Why do you think it is a negative? As a prospective new owner, they may see the rent situation as an asset for cash flow reasons. What is it now, 3.5 m for the 90 years? No upkeep, that's the landlords responsibility, west ham keep all the ticket money. Small change compared to the TV money but could be seen as positive.
Spurs & West Ham have new stadiums finished - ours is not, yes our club has potential off the playing side - I just think it's all rumours - Spurs one day & W Ham the next - it looks like they want both a team with potential & a good ground. If they were interested !Despite the on-the-pitch performance in the last couple of years, surely prospective buyers will look at that gorgeous stadium being built on the docks and be interested?
dyu think west ham would be dearer than everton ?
Yep - we are almost 1/2 a billion in debt -
This doesnt make sense Joseph.
Our debt is high, thats why MSP pulled out of putting more money into our club - only into our new ground 100 million - it fell far short of their initial investment .... into our club as we have unpaid loans .....
Spurs have a 1billion debt for their shiny new Stadium with still no Naming rights agreed.
The other negative for us is the uncertainty over our PL status and this FFP case hanging over us.
We have an unfinished ground & debts all over the place - thats why MSP only invested in the ground we are due to go to an independent hearing in October to justify our debts - we are blaming it all on covid .. Which is not true we got let off now a neutral committee is looking at our books thats why Beto was signed to be paid in 2024 ... we are in a financial mess TBH ....
I don’t know do the mega rich , nation states and such go in for circuses?Despite the on-the-pitch performance in the last couple of years, surely prospective buyers will look at that gorgeous stadium being built on the docks and be interested?
