ForestBlue
Player Valuation: £10m
Me too and wouldn't expect it to make any sense anyway if I did read it all.I started reading the report and gave up as it's so confusing
They just make it up as the go along as seen by our first successful appeal.
Me too and wouldn't expect it to make any sense anyway if I did read it all.I started reading the report and gave up as it's so confusing
Baseline is 3 according to that. Then 3 more for size of breach.So maybe the baseline is 4 but we got 2 more for “incomplete information” and they got 2 less for cooperation?
That might indicate we’re going to get another 4 points on the next charge then.
But who knows, they might add more considering it’s a 2nd charge in consecutive seasons as an aggravating factor.
View attachment 249186
So basically they agreed with Forest's BS mitigating circumstances and rejected ours
Literal corruption
Nor do I now .. was in an inch of it taking everything I had a few decades ago but thankfully managed to stop.Well I don't gamble so I can't take your bet!![]()
Tightened that up for you broWe shot ourselves in the foot by having Moshiri
So they’ve already appealed then?
@Mikey_Fitzgerald
Don't even try and read that report lads. You will be spewing up after a few pages. It is more like a cheerleaders fan club commission report focusing on how great Forest are, how evil Everton are and therefore they don't deserve a harsh punishment.
Shot ourselves in the foot by allowing that parasite anywhere near the football club in the first place imo
No, they have not appealed. Their mitigations and cooperation reduced the sentence. This is all part of the first hearing.