So if I understand correctly, Forest breach psr rules by 34.5 millions which is substantially much more than us, yet they get only 4 points whilst we get 6...only way this would make sense is if we don't get any point deductions for the second breach, otherwise everton should sue the PL.
How is that more reason though? The fact there was a "process" with no outline regarding any punishment that the league has decided to enforce is laughably inept, in Everton levels.
This should be a good reason to not get any more points, but in reality we get 6 more
Yarrgh
Player Valuation: £70m
You'll have to give for the knockout coz there's no way you'd get the decision on points.
Because Im desperately trying to erase the last decade or so of Everton entirely from my memory.
I wasn’t buying the theory a lot of you had that the sentence would be reduced if you agreed not to appeal. I didn’t see how that would work- how would you put that in your written reasons to justify it without it stinking of a deal?
But having now seen the judgement I think that’s pretty much what they’ve done using generic “co-operation” to cover past co-operation but also imply future cooperation. Even if it’s not been agreed on I think there’s an implied threat those two points are in jeopardy if there’s an appeal. Grubby.
just gives forest and luton a massive lift, is not inpossible but just puts massive pressure on players/ fans. We can do it but i would not be confident with lack of goals in this team
People keep making the mistake of using reason and thinking sensibly, the "rulebook" has just been thrown out the window, this is now a Jungle.
It better be because if not then the club should sue the PL
Drico
Player Valuation: £70m
It’s actually incredibly unfair on those players - useless, though they are - and the fans.
Saying that, let’s stuff Forest 5-0.
Wat Tyler
Player Valuation: £70m
So the panel accept that they KNOWINGLY breached:
The Premier League commission ruling said: “When a club like Forest took the risk of effectively ignoring the PSR warning from its finance director before the January window in 2023, and rather than looking to sell players, it added players to its squad, ultimately leaving itself with just two weeks to sell Player A [Brennan Johnson] in the summer 2023 window, such risk taking and ‘sailing close to the wind’ needs a proportionate sanction to maintain the integrity of the Premier League.”
The Premier League commission ruling said: “When a club like Forest took the risk of effectively ignoring the PSR warning from its finance director before the January window in 2023, and rather than looking to sell players, it added players to its squad, ultimately leaving itself with just two weeks to sell Player A [Brennan Johnson] in the summer 2023 window, such risk taking and ‘sailing close to the wind’ needs a proportionate sanction to maintain the integrity of the Premier League.”
I kept telling you all we should keep appealing till they reduced it to zero
your fat chairman has paid them off
sorry mate i’m pissed at this
PS hope we beat you
we have
nobody to do anything we do we?
if we had all wants needed IE owners a board etc we would off
Welcome
Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.
Shop
