....would you believe some of these threads.
- Status
20m and I would drive the lazy twerp there myself.
D
Deleted member 28206
Guest
Worst thread I've ever seen.
Durham Toffee
Shameless Wool
If we spent the money on Ronaldo, Messi and Neymar...
Then no.
Then no.
In this market, we'd be unable to buy replacement value.
Keep the player.
Keep the player.
If we bring in a gifted technical attacking midfielder who can be the focal point of the attacks and let Rom stay on the shoulder of the last man, then no, keep Rom all day, as he's one of the best in the world at that role.
If we don't, and we persist in using Rom as a target man, cash in all day long.
If we don't, and we persist in using Rom as a target man, cash in all day long.
No because we can't play a £65m cheque up front on it's own for the next 4 months can we?
Ashtonian
Banned on request
Ronaldo, messi, griffiths, kane, off the top of my head
only one diamond in our team mate, and his name isn't rom.....
Chimpy Glassman
Player Valuation: £30m
Don't be soft. It's been a question hanging over the whole window.
Yes, it's all been sorted out now but hypothetically if someone like a PSG where to come in and offer the asking price of someone who has looked off the mark for the last 11 league games (0 goals, 0 assists) and stunk out the Euros (AND if we hypothetically got someone of quality in) is that such a bad idea?
What? Asking a perfectly reasonable question about a situation about the transfer window, in the transfer window thread?
Did you miss the hypothetical player replacement bit too?
Can I just clarify - I'm not saying we should or shouldn't - I'm simply asking the question.
If we had Mikkel Forrsell lined up then i'd seriously consider getting rid of the useless tit
.....it's a good idea to have a separate thread about the value of every player in the squad, there simply aren't enough transfer threads.
Last edited:
We haven't even been able to sign a back up to Rom yet. So, what gives you the impression we'd be able to replace him?
- Status
