Search results for query: *

I didn't say professional footballers retire. I questions a club paying in excess of 20m for a player that is not yet back from an ACL injury that he sustained last Nov. Regardless of rhetoric, a ruptured ACL is a career threatening injury. There is risk the player may not return to the...

And you took the time out to post that comment, I would say u are a blast at parties

I don't care what he is called, he is an ignorant person and I have no time for him

Promise?

The source of the data and the paper manages 40 hospitals with real doctors as opposed to football fans doing the analysis

I didn't say it ends careers, the data I posted gives the results of a study and it suggests it does end some careers (19%), and a lot of the time the player doesn't recover to their previous level. Hence my comment. Would a club really spend over 20m on a player that is not back playing since...

It did say a loan but wages covered and a loan fee would be a bonus, but having just sold JWP and Lavia fee agreed of 60m with two clubs I would think they have a few coppers in the piggybank

Studies show that within one year of ACL reconstruction surgery: Only one-third of athletes return to their prior level of competition. Less than 50 percent return to the same level of play within two to seven years. Only 81 percent will return to any level of sport...

Is Broja back from his ACL injury last Nov? Would a club buy someone for that amount of money on an injured player and it is not like a small knock like Harrison, it is a proper career threatening injury

Sky ticker is saying Saints want Holgate

Isn't that what I have said, I have said this is not the place for that discussion

We are discussing the financial situation of EFC in relation to their ability to purchase players on the transfer thread on the GOT forum, it is not the place to discuss and compare the financial situation of other football clubs. And if you followed the thread you would see that the discussion...

Mate, why do you state the obvious so much? We know that. Follow the discussion and you will see why I am saying that Have you eyed up how fooked Villa will be financially in the next 12 months? Not quite on topic is it? maybe on a different thread if u want to discuss it

Kean, Gordon, Richy, and loans for Danjuma, Harrison and Young on a free suggest otherwise

When the new stadium opens the revenue from the old stadium will cease. I don't know what the uplift will be but if GP is 16m a year I can't imagine that rising to much over 25m. If loans are taken out to build it then the uplift could all go on repayments.

The additional money generated by our as-yet-unbuilt stadium has already been spent? You didn't say revenue from the new stadium, you said stadium revenue. The amount is published in the EFC accounts

That is the point I am making, they didn't bid because they didn't want him. If they wanted him he would be their player now

That money is already been spent, and it is only circa 16m a year.

I don't think u need him to stay up tbh. Dyche knows how to keep a team in the PL and u are making some good additions. If for example, u got 60m for Onana and could trigger Adams release clause of 20m and if u could use the funds to get a good striker in then you would have no issue staying up...

Yes, all clubs do and all clubs don't automatically spend all of the money generated through player sales on new players. If you get loans to pay for the stadium the loans need to repaid, where does this money come from to repay the loans and pay the interest?