Search results for query: *

It's a simplistic view I know in the world of celebrity and media hype but there is a lot to be said for the idea of a goalkeeper and CB pairing that know each other inside out. Won't happen, and shouldn't just because they play together but its not just that. If there were other stand out...

How lovely if it is all done pre-Luton away with them still desperate for points and we give them a good old-fashioned hiding. The convention in pre-game analysis will be that Everton have their flipflops on, already on the beach etc. so it would be extra sweet to take points we don't even...

Surely defending the last 30 yds cannot be the plan here???

Mykolenko 44 mins Dyche 45 mins

To be fair to Forest the quality of refereeing is so, so, so poor and has been for several years now. Somebody needs to do something. However their owner is an absolute clown by all accounts, there have been worse referee/VAR performances.

For the long term good selling a portion of the stadium (and therefore future revenues) seems short sighted. I think I'd rather a genuine fire sale of players this summer and assemble a firefighting squad to get us 17th next year or two. Let's face it they can't be much worse than the current...

Criminal waste of 30m when we don't have a psr pot to #£%^ in.

How on earth can cooperation reduce a sanction by 2 points in one case, but then accepted mitigation re usm AND early plea reduce a sanction by 1 point in another? How on earth can accepting double jeopardy for 2/3 of the period reduce the penalty by only 2/5? If they apply consistent approach...

If the fullness of the charge cannot be dealt with then surely it can't be dealt with at all yet. See PL vs M City for precedent.

Especially when our whole game strategy is long balls over the top.

This is like Brighton away. We look.like the 10 men.

Dont like the way gomes is going in to some of these challenges at the moment.

For a must win game this is really, really poor.

This is why I get a bit annoyed at the way we lambast ourselves over wages ratios. Yes ours is far too high and unsustainable, no question. But it is because we (rightly or wrongly) had an ambition to compete with the 6, not the 14, and to do so you need to pay the cost of 'better' players...

Not suggesting Spurs are doing anything wrong but a question for some of you who clearly know more about accounting than me - if Spurs are depreciating 72m per year, but not paying that off the debt are they effectively able to boost their other spending allowance under psr? What about the...

Who takes it?

How often do our players just fall over by the way?

Clear, just overrule it

Wtf are these aimless, overhit, straight balls forward supposed to achieve?

When it seems even tarkowski has given up on dyche it says it all.