NEA lol, Everton spending money is Boss LadDidn’t they say 42 including 6, not plus 6?
I guess we're only speculating over the numbers but if we have waited a firtnight to save several million pounds it's obviously worth it.No it's £42m plus add ons were it was £45m plus add ons, plus it's 20% sell on instead of 25% add ons. Not a great deal but still better. But it should have been done earlier I'll give you that.
Wasn't he more left footed than McNeil?For those with longer memories or age on their side, Dibling plays & moves in a very similar way to Chris Waddle … and he wasn’t half bad.
there's no f either.
It always applies to profit. Not sure why people have such a hard time with this.I'm pretty sure sell on fees apply to profit, not full fees. I think there's quite a bit of misunderstanding on them.
We always struggle with the right, being socialists like...Finally got a right winger. Was beginning to think it was against the rules or something.
I've no time for Sky to be fair, but I think this is aI wouldnt trust sky if they told me the sky was blue. Remember them reporting about us bidding for zaha, then the club actually came out and said no we haven't. Then they basically called Everton liars and said they were right
Seen how they report Liverpools deals and how they report city's.
Also it makes me laugh when publications dont have a clue about deals till other people report them. Then all of a sudden they miraculously know the ins and outs of the deal.
Jonathan Wilkes was the fella…he was one of my neighbours in London.He is the equivalent of the person who got famous for being Robbie Williams' mate