Zatara
Player Valuation: £100m

Tyler Dibling braced for Everton transfer 'disappointment' - 'No-one else'
A former Southampton favourite has been talking Tyler Dibling after Everton saw three bids rejected for the winger
If he went to Palace for £50m I’d be doing cartwheels, no way he is worth that
If he went to Palace for £50m I’d be doing cartwheels, no way he is worth that
And if Palace finish above us in the league and get all of that overpayment back. Not saying he's worth that by any straw but we sold Gordon for £40m plus £5m add ons which we've had. Not a great deal of difference in them fee's is there.
The same Southampton trying to get a 50m sale out of him?What in his game are you seeing that couldnt elevate him into a top player that Southampton and others see?
And if Palace finish above us in the league and get all of that overpayment back. Not saying he's worth that by any straw but we sold Gordon for £40m plus £5m add ons which we've had. Not a great deal of difference in them fee's is there.
At least he’s somethingWe need to fill 3 or 4 first team slots.
Dibling is an expensive luxury.
It stinks if the type of deal a Sky six club with the massive revenues would do e.g. one for the future. I’m personally not sure it’s the right type of deal for us to do when we really need players punching their weight and being productive over the next few seasons. Biuy for the future by all means but not at that price when that’s the sort of fee I’d expect for a more mature playerWe need to fill 3 or 4 first team slots.
Dibling is an expensive luxury.
We need to fill 3 or 4 first team slots.
Dibling is an expensive luxury.
So , it appears , is filling 3or 4 first team slots .We need to fill 3 or 4 first team slots.
Dibling is an expensive luxury.
So , it appears , is filling 3or 4 first team slots .
I think neither will happen this window.
Last season he was 18. He's not good enough for City or Chelsea at the moment to spend 50 m to loan him out. He will improve us. As for the sell on clause that's only on profit ie if we sold him for 90 m they would get 10 m, and we might be able to by that clause for about 5 m in a season or 2Mate it’s £50m for a prospect !!!!!!
He played in the 2nd worst team in premier league history and not did not look far ahead of his teammates.
Okay let me ask you this, if he was a potential £100m + player why hasn’t a city or Chelsea or someone like that not come in for him ?
Not saying he is not talented he is but £50m talented ? Sorry I haven’t seen it in him yet so we’re spending £50m on a player we will have to develop ourselves.
I’m sorry I just don’t see value for money especially with a sell on clause
Last season he was 18. He's not good enough for City or Chelsea at the moment to spend 50 m to loan him out. He will improve us. As for the sell on clause that's only on profit ie if we sold him for 90 m they would get 10 m, and we might be able to by that clause for about 5 m in a season or 2