No he hasn’t. Southampton pulled him out of no contract training to protect their cash cow.He has refused to train ....
No he hasn’t. Southampton pulled him out of no contract training to protect their cash cow.He has refused to train ....
Didn't he also say the clubs were around 3mil apart ?According to Bobble they haven’t. He said they were clear from day 1 what they wanted.
I honestly do think we could have a really year this year if we were to sort what we need to sort with this level of quality.
We are due one and secondly I am just sniffing a few teams who had good seasons last season struggling
Or they just have their priceNo other club is buy this kid for £50m.
We are the only club bidding and Southampton want a bidding war.
Yeh, but the original post was either/or. I understand they both are 'different' investments. It's my opinion that having a RW is more beneficial over having Grealish (who also isn't a guaranteed success) where we have a very good starting player alreadyTwo different investments.
Grealish is an investment for right now - you look at him and say go on get us up the league and into Europe and make us money next season.
Dibling in an investment in the future, you cost me £50 mill today, but you will make my £50 back + another £50 mill in four years time.
Both investments you ae hoping to make you a return.
They are gazumping us - this is when we could have thrown Michael Keane in as a bargain chip .... oh we gave him a year contract - Everton That ....Or they just have their price
If we didnt give him a year contract then we couldnt have thrown in Michael Keane.They are gazumping us - this is when we could have thrown Michael Keane in as a bargain chip .... oh we gave him a year contract - Everton That ....
Southampton is about his ability TBH giving him a deal as 4th choice CB was ridiculous & you know it you go out of the sun .....If we didnt give him a year contract then we couldnt have thrown in Michael Keane.
Get out the sun Joey, go and have a lie down, you are all over the place here.
We could perhaps throw Alli in?If we didnt give him a year contract then we couldnt have thrown in Michael Keane.
Get out the sun Joey, go and have a lie down, you are all over the place here.
Have you ever been involved in a deal of 50m or thereabouts ?
We are all clueless about what is happening and one opinion is as good as the other.
Without having a clue as to what is happening then how do you know the club is incompetent?
He has said nothing has changed, we still haven’t walked away. He didn’t say though if we’re still in negotiations or we have come to our maximum and waiting to see if player power and no other club sniffing, changes Southampton’s stance
The fee of 50m is unrealistically high, of course they set the price high, thankfully we have not been silly enough to meet it.
We bid low and have increased our offers.
We will see if a deal can be made somewhere in the middle, if not move on.
To push this deal on more quickly would probably require the player to ask for a transfer, refuse to train , say bad things about his club.
He doesn't seem to want to do any of these things... which is to his credit.
I have no problem with having Michael Keane as our 4th choice CB.Southampton is about his ability TBH giving him a deal as 4th choice CB was ridiculous & you know it you go out of the sun .....
He has left us & retired what a bargain he wasn't thanks to BK .....We could perhaps through Alli in?
He was ideal to get rid & Coleman should have been kept as coach & made to do his coaching badges - it commonsense, but its an Everton That moment ....I have no problem with having Michael Keane as our 4th choice CB.
I would have preffered Nesta, but needs must elsewhere.