Confirmed Signing Jack Grealish

Status
Not open for further replies.

If I was Grealo and City wanted me to move I'd be asking them to subsidise my wages to bring me up to 300k for the next 2 years or I'll sit it out. If Everton want him I'd give him 150k and City can cover the rest. They dug their own grave.
 

brittcop1 said:
Well we are already ahead of that PR move... We signed Saint Seamus to a " Blue for Life" contract so that we could keep the fine people of Ireland happy while we quietly sneak Jack ( formerly O'Grealish) into the team...sneaky this new ownership group;)
Click to expand...
'Declan Rice is ours'
 
Jebus_lives said:
And yet, he played 50 games in a season where Man City won a treble. He played 13 CL games, playing every minute of the QF to the final.

Only Silva, Haarland, Rodri and Gundogan played more.

When he didn't play they didn't win as much as when he did play. So I'd say you're mistaken.
Click to expand...
I watched those games. He wasn't a key player and contributed little in terms of goals and assists.
 
We are after a PREMIERE loan which basically means we pay City a loan fee which is half his wages and we pay the other half.

So maybe we will pay 300k a week after all
 

Is the following possible? Asking as I might miss something in my reasoning.

- We decide to buy him on a 3 year contract for 45mil.
- He earns 15m per year as I understand it. Thus we offer City 45m to buy. Of that 45mil city uses 22.5mil to offer to Grealish for wage compensation.
- Thus we can offer 150K wages per week for the 3 year contract.
- The other 150K is compensated by City via the 22.5mil and City are left with 22.5mil they then get for the player.

Thus City receives indirectly only 22.5mil as a sell price and Everton buys him on a 3 year contract and at the same time we don't break our wage structure as the extra wages comes from the buying of the player. Are something like that at all possible as in my eyes it seems possible unless I missed something.
 
Omarzam said:
Is the following possible? Asking as I might miss something in my reasoning.

- We decide to buy him on a 3 year contract for 45mil.
- He earns 15m per year as I understand it. Thus we offer City 45m to buy. Of that 45mil city uses 22.5mil to offer to Grealish for wage compensation.
- Thus we can offer 150K wages per week for the 3 year contract.
- The other 150K is compensated by City via the 22.5mil and City are left with 22.5mil they then get for the player.

Thus City receives indirectly only 22.5mil as a sell price and Everton buys him on a 3 year contract and at the same time we don't break our wage structure as the extra wages comes from the buying of the player. Are something like that at all possible as in my eyes it seems possible unless I missed something.
Click to expand...
jk5niy666ho21.webp
 
Mickey said:
If I was Grealo and City wanted me to move I'd be asking them to subsidise my wages to bring me up to 300k for the next 2 years or I'll sit it out. If Everton want him I'd give him 150k and City can cover the rest. They dug their own grave.
Click to expand...
They signed a contract he’s entitled to the money , he Might fancy getting in the England squad but if he drops half his wages he’ll lose out on nearly £16m .

If he walks away from that he probably needs sectioning rather than another England cap
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top