And Gordon’s a s**tWe charged the same for Gordon so I can’t whinge about it but still feel it’s too much. Can get two players for that fee.

And Gordon’s a s**tWe charged the same for Gordon so I can’t whinge about it but still feel it’s too much. Can get two players for that fee.
all a decoyI’d be surprised if there isn’t any others interested and if there ain’t it’s a flag anyway. If it was being done can’t help think the opportunity for us may have passed.
The problem is, our track record in these types of deals is patchy at best. Most of the players we’ve signed for £25m or more have been huge wastes of money and end up leaving for nothing or sold at a huge loss. We aren’t Chelsea- we can’t afford to buy 4 or 5 players per window at £40m plus and just take the hit that most of them won’t work out. If we’re pushing towards £45/50m for a 19 year old who may or may not become a superstar that’s a hell of a risk when we don’t have the financial fair play wriggle room the sky 6 have.
We’ll see, I personally wasn’t sold on this deal anyway! But it ain’t my dosh.all a decoy
to get who we want![]()
He must be Bale level to worth 100m.
Honestly what are the chances?
Crikey that’s a bit of a strong attack. Not sure you can accuse MikeH72 of being ignorant. Players agents 100% speak to other agents.Are you actually being serious?! So we should have been tapping up our targets all along? Are you not aware of the legal challenge that Forest have just threatened to Spurs over MG-W?
Possibly the most ignorant post on this thread to date.
Would people feel better if we say we spent 65 mill on Ndiaye and Dibling combined?
Big clubs spend big money. This was the whole point of moving to a new stadium and getting new owners. We’ve had 27 out the last 30 years selling to buy, going with what we’ve got, knife to a gun fight. It’s about time we started making a couple of statements.
Except Dibling is 10 years younger, plays in a position we need and will have a resale value.
I didn’t like Gylfi at all because I thought he ran like he was in treacle and had a fat first touch. That midfield of him Gueye and Schneiderlin was a literal toilet seat.
That being said he was in the team under multiple different managers and had decent goal and assist contributions at a time when a lot of other players couldn’t perform at all.
I think that's a pretty fair, if optimistic, analysis.You spend money to make moneny mate, i think TFG understand this.
This all isnt just about right now its also about future, developing layers and gettign a return:
Barry 22
Charly 23
Aznou 19
Travers 26
Dibling 19
All these players have been chosen purposely to hold release and ultimately make profit.
Even KDH, i think has been picked to support the pathway of Armstrong eventually - who will be in his early 20's when we might look to move KDH on.
There is a plan being executed here if you care to see it.
We've moved on from deals we can do, to doing deals we should do.
I'd rather we didn't, just in case Ipswich said yes and we signed himWe should bid for Hutchinson to show Saints there’s plenty of fish
Branners was 1m. Stones was 3m. DCL was 2m.Our better signings have been rookies. Branthwaite, Calvert Lewin, Stones, Richarlison, and then of course our own academy products of Rooney Barkley Rodwell Gordon.
It’s when we’ve paid for ‘proven’ talent that we’ve normally fallen foul. Schneidelrin, Klaasen, Siggurdson, Rooney second time, Tosun, Walcott etc.
if nobody buys him this window he will goe in the nxt oneSouthampton playing dangerous game here
They want spurs/Newcastle to come in. If they don’t and we walk away
They have an unhappy player who will not sign a deal and walks away for free or isn’t the talent they think he is and this was the high water point to sell.