Unsure why anyone is getting their knickers in a twist about the fee etc, TFG are very unlikely to have just given a set amount to spend in transfers unless they are idiots.
Far more likely us they have given a rough ball figure in terms of wages and fees and complete costs allowed within a range fir the dinner spend - likely season spend.
Dibling for 35m on say 35k per week, with minimal signing fee for 5 years, costs. 9m in wages so total costs commited too is 44m
Now say Fofana is wanting 120k per week and costs 40m with same signing fees etc. 31.2m in wages so total commitment is 71.2m
Over a 27m difference
Do that on say 2-3 signings and what would look like only 15m more spent is actually spending or commitng to spending close to 80m extra and has to be factored in.
The combined fee and wage costs are gonna be the budget this year. Not some arbitrary - we have 150m to spend in fees.
So for a player wanting much higher wages we are more restricted in how high the fee can go, if wage demands are much more reasonable then we have way more room to increase the initial fees.
I'm guessing Dibling currently on a youth contract at Saints is asking for a lot less than either Kubo or Fofana would be - hugely less in fact.
Same can be applied to Douglas Luiz who'd cost 30-35m with currently 150-175k per week say compared to the cost of buying Mcatee who'd in all likelihood cost less initial and far far less on wages, so what would look a similar outlet for the club on fee would actually be 30m cheaper a deal.