Summer Transfer Window 2025 Thread

@Nymzee since you’re an AI fan I asked it to analyse your responses in the last few pages by copying and pasting them and asked them to psychologically analyse them and here’s what it said:

Thanks — this is a great sample. Here’s a breakdown of the tone, inferred psychology, and group dynamics behind these kinds of posts:

🧠


Tone & Language Analysis

  • Tone:
    • Cynical
    • Dismissive
    • Irritated
    • Slightly superior/defensive

  • Common Features:
    • Sarcasm (“Piece of piss being a journo”)
    • Discrediting (“nothing he’s told us is news”)
    • Passive-aggressive minimising (“maybe you’d struggle with that…”)
    • Frustration at perceived low quality (“fluff piece”)
    • Economic grievance (“insult to people who pay…

🔍

Inferred Emotions and Insecurities

1.


Disappointment Redirected as Anger


These posters may have expected or hoped for real insight into transfers or club direction. When faced with a bland or vague update, the emotional letdown gets redirected at the journalist — turning passive disappointment into active criticism.


Underlying insecurity:


“I care deeply about this club and want reassurance that someone has a clue what’s going on — and no one does.”


2.


Status Assertion / Intellectual Superiority

Statements like “maybe you’d struggle with that but most wouldn’t” imply a desire to elevate oneself above others — not just the journalist, but readers who might find value in the piece.

Underlying insecurity:


“I want to be seen as more insightful or perceptive than average — I don’t want to be duped or patronised.”


3.

Distrust in Media / Information Fatigue

These users are skeptical of paid content, perhaps due to repeated cycles of hype, false rumours, or vague PR. There’s a bitterness at being made to “pay” for what they view as recycled content

Underlying insecurity:

“I don’t want to be taken advantage of again — emotionally or financially — by sources I used to trust.

👥


Group Dynamics at Play

  • Echo Chamber Reinforcement:
    Multiple posts echo the same sentiment, creating a kind of mutual validation loop. Once one person criticises the journalist, others feel more comfortable piling on, reinforcing the group’s shared sense of disappointment and superiority.
  • Cynicism as a Badge of Experience:
    Long-time fans often wear skepticism like armour. Publicly dismissing optimism or official narratives signals that you’re “in the know” and not easily fooled.

🧩 Summary:

These posts aren’t just venting about a journalist — they reflect:

  • Frustration at the lack of transparency or progress during a tense transfer window.
  • A desire for real insight in a climate full of uncertainty.
  • A defense mechanism against the emotional cost of being let down (again).
  • A need to assert one’s voice and credibility within the fan community.

Would you like me to look at a contrasting set — maybe posts that are more optimistic or anxious? Or would you like a mini typology of the kinds of fan personas that emerge in these threads (e.g. the Skeptic, the ITK, the Club Loyalist, etc.)?
 

@Nymzee since you’re an AI fan I asked it to analyse your responses in the last few pages by copying and pasting them and asked them to psychologically analyse them and here’s what it said:

Thanks — this is a great sample. Here’s a breakdown of the tone, inferred psychology, and group dynamics behind these kinds of posts:

🧠


Tone & Language Analysis

  • Tone:
    • Cynical
    • Dismissive
    • Irritated
    • Slightly superior/defensive

  • Common Features:
    • Sarcasm (“Piece of piss being a journo”)
    • Discrediting (“nothing he’s told us is news”)
    • Passive-aggressive minimising (“maybe you’d struggle with that…”)
    • Frustration at perceived low quality (“fluff piece”)
    • Economic grievance (“insult to people who pay…

🔍

Inferred Emotions and Insecurities

1.


Disappointment Redirected as Anger


These posters may have expected or hoped for real insight into transfers or club direction. When faced with a bland or vague update, the emotional letdown gets redirected at the journalist — turning passive disappointment into active criticism.


Underlying insecurity:


“I care deeply about this club and want reassurance that someone has a clue what’s going on — and no one does.”


2.


Status Assertion / Intellectual Superiority

Statements like “maybe you’d struggle with that but most wouldn’t” imply a desire to elevate oneself above others — not just the journalist, but readers who might find value in the piece.

Underlying insecurity:


“I want to be seen as more insightful or perceptive than average — I don’t want to be duped or patronised.”


3.

Distrust in Media / Information Fatigue

These users are skeptical of paid content, perhaps due to repeated cycles of hype, false rumours, or vague PR. There’s a bitterness at being made to “pay” for what they view as recycled content

Underlying insecurity:

“I don’t want to be taken advantage of again — emotionally or financially — by sources I used to trust.

👥


Group Dynamics at Play

  • Echo Chamber Reinforcement:
    Multiple posts echo the same sentiment, creating a kind of mutual validation loop. Once one person criticises the journalist, others feel more comfortable piling on, reinforcing the group’s shared sense of disappointment and superiority.
  • Cynicism as a Badge of Experience:
    Long-time fans often wear skepticism like armour. Publicly dismissing optimism or official narratives signals that you’re “in the know” and not easily fooled.

🧩 Summary:

These posts aren’t just venting about a journalist — they reflect:

  • Frustration at the lack of transparency or progress during a tense transfer window.
  • A desire for real insight in a climate full of uncertainty.
  • A defense mechanism against the emotional cost of being let down (again).
  • A need to assert one’s voice and credibility within the fan community.

Would you like me to look at a contrasting set — maybe posts that are more optimistic or anxious? Or would you like a mini typology of the kinds of fan personas that emerge in these threads (e.g. the Skeptic, the ITK, the Club Loyalist, etc.)?

You werer doing so well until you referenced sarcasm.
 
You werer doing so well until you referenced sarcasm.
I gasped at this part mate.

2.

Status Assertion / Intellectual Superiority

Statements like “maybe you’d struggle with that but most wouldn’t” imply a desire to elevate oneself above others — not just the journalist, but readers who might find value in the piece.

Underlying insecurity:


“I want to be seen as more insightful or perceptive than average — I don’t want to be duped or patronised.”
 

I don't think that's what is happening, I'll could be proven wrong but I feel we are trying to be thorough with recruitment choices and try to negotiate affordable deals with an newly assembled enlistment team. It might not fit the timetable of certain supporters but I'm still optimistic. Would prefer more players at this point absolutely but I'm not dispirited yet. This isnt Moshiri or kenwright so I don't know why people keep expecting the same outcome?
Think we got Barry in for around 8-10m lower than his release which his club wanted, so yeah negotiating smartly when we had Eva's much needing doing as we do is smart.

Caveat is on certain players if you try argue the toss too much over a fee you'll lose out on the player to someone else, so comes down to if the fee is still reasonable for the player and what he brings.
 
I asked AI to analyse the previous page. Here’s its findings:

I can’t access or analyze specific forum threads like the one you linked directly — and even if I could, offering psychological assessments or diagnoses of people based on online posts without their consent (and without a clinical setting) would be ethically and professionally inappropriate.





That said, if you’re noticing patterns in posts on football forums like GrandOldTeam — such as intense reactions to transfer rumours, doom-laden predictions, or wild optimism — there are some general psychological insights we can explore. These don’t apply to individuals specifically, but they can help you understand common behaviours in fan communities:

⚽️ Common Insecurities or Emotions in Football Forum Posts (Generally Speaking)
  1. Loss of Control → Overanalyzing Transfers
    • Fans often feel powerless over club decisions. Obsessing over transfers can be a way to regain a sense of control or agency.
    • Insecurity: “Is the club doing enough? Are we being left behind?”
  2. Bed wetting simpletons.
  3. Tribal Identity & Belonging → Us vs. Them Mentality
    • Supporting a club becomes part of one’s identity. Criticism of the club or rival success can trigger personal defensiveness.
    • Insecurity: “If my club fails, what does that say about me?”
  4. Putting entire self worth in a sports team.
  5. Fear of Rejection or Failure → Catastrophizing
    • Threads often include phrases like “We’re going down” or “Moshiri’s destroyed us.” This can be a pre-emptive emotional defense: expect the worst, and you won’t be hurt.
    • Insecurity: “I need to prepare for disappointment to avoid heartbreak.”
  6. Misogynists.
  7. Status & Recognition → ‘I Told You So’ Posting
    • Some posters assert authority by reminding others of previous predictions.
    • Insecurity: “I need others to acknowledge I’m insightful — it gives me value in the group.”
  8. Wrestling fans.
  9. Optimism as Coping
    • Others swing the opposite way: “This is our year.” This can be a hopeful projection masking anxiety.
    • Insecurity: “I need to believe things will get better, even if I’m scared they won’t.

🧠 Why Football Forums Get So Emotional
  • Football is tribal, symbolic, and deeply emotional.
  • Fans often feel personally invested in the club’s fortunes.
  • A transfer window isn’t just about player movement — it’s a litmus test for hope, ambition, trust in leadership, and club identity.

Polish_20250718_062824299.webp
 
To be fair that's why it's not a piece of piss doing it, people expect you to provide them with news even when there isn't any, and somehow end up blaming you for telling them things they don't want to hear as if you reporting it is what made it happen.

Know from.my brother that you can also as a reporter gets pieces commissioned that you stick good time and effort into researching that all of a sudden something changes and the piece gets scrapped. He had a full analysis piece commissioned on Tete that got pulled for obvious reasons
 

@Nymzee since you’re an AI fan I asked it to analyse your responses in the last few pages by copying and pasting them and asked them to psychologically analyse them and here’s what it said:

Thanks — this is a great sample. Here’s a breakdown of the tone, inferred psychology, and group dynamics behind these kinds of posts:

🧠


Tone & Language Analysis

  • Tone:
    • Cynical
    • Dismissive
    • Irritated
    • Slightly superior/defensive

  • Common Features:
    • Sarcasm (“Piece of piss being a journo”)
    • Discrediting (“nothing he’s told us is news”)
    • Passive-aggressive minimising (“maybe you’d struggle with that…”)
    • Frustration at perceived low quality (“fluff piece”)
    • Economic grievance (“insult to people who pay…

🔍

Inferred Emotions and Insecurities

1.


Disappointment Redirected as Anger


These posters may have expected or hoped for real insight into transfers or club direction. When faced with a bland or vague update, the emotional letdown gets redirected at the journalist — turning passive disappointment into active criticism.


Underlying insecurity:


“I care deeply about this club and want reassurance that someone has a clue what’s going on — and no one does.”


2.


Status Assertion / Intellectual Superiority

Statements like “maybe you’d struggle with that but most wouldn’t” imply a desire to elevate oneself above others — not just the journalist, but readers who might find value in the piece.

Underlying insecurity:


“I want to be seen as more insightful or perceptive than average — I don’t want to be duped or patronised.”


3.

Distrust in Media / Information Fatigue

These users are skeptical of paid content, perhaps due to repeated cycles of hype, false rumours, or vague PR. There’s a bitterness at being made to “pay” for what they view as recycled content

Underlying insecurity:

“I don’t want to be taken advantage of again — emotionally or financially — by sources I used to trust.

👥


Group Dynamics at Play

  • Echo Chamber Reinforcement:
    Multiple posts echo the same sentiment, creating a kind of mutual validation loop. Once one person criticises the journalist, others feel more comfortable piling on, reinforcing the group’s shared sense of disappointment and superiority.
  • Cynicism as a Badge of Experience:
    Long-time fans often wear skepticism like armour. Publicly dismissing optimism or official narratives signals that you’re “in the know” and not easily fooled.

🧩 Summary:

These posts aren’t just venting about a journalist — they reflect:

  • Frustration at the lack of transparency or progress during a tense transfer window.
  • A desire for real insight in a climate full of uncertainty.
  • A defense mechanism against the emotional cost of being let down (again).
  • A need to assert one’s voice and credibility within the fan community.

Would you like me to look at a contrasting set — maybe posts that are more optimistic or anxious? Or would you like a mini typology of the kinds of fan personas that emerge in these threads (e.g. the Skeptic, the ITK, the Club Loyalist, etc.)?
This is definitely AI.
No way you would spend time making this up.
 
Last time we went into a window thinking it was all bright and fuzzy we got stung bad!! That summer was 2017 and by this time of that window we’d signed (1st team only):

Klaasen - £23.6m
Onyekuru - £8.6m
Pickford - £25m
Keane - £25m
Sandro - £5.2m
Rooney - £10m(?)
Martina - Free

That was nearly £100m as at 17th July 2017 and there is only one player that will go down as a great at this club and that’s Pickford. Splashing the cash and having bodies in the door doesn’t guarantee anything but a reduced bank account. We also had PED claiming we “won the transfer market” and since then we’ve been a punch bag for the PL, other teams and other fans. Early signings mean nothing.

That carefree, gunslinger approach absolutely ruined this club for nearly a decade and set us on the path to a potential ownership by 777 and relegation several times.

We have to get it right this time because we won’t get another chance. This is why we have to be considerate with every deal for every player and not just appease a percentage of disgruntled fans on forums or social media.

People will say also that PSR, new board, no Euro footy blah blah are just excuses to hide behind. But they’re not excuses, they are real issues that give context to the situation this club finds themselves in the summer of 25.

So, stop letting past regimes dictate your mood/feelings towards a new beginning for Everton. Go and enjoy the sunshine and get behind the new signing when they do eventually sign, whomever they may be.

UTFT!
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top