Its 10m a year, thats the figure that was widely reported and until somebody can prove otherwise, its the number we should all use.
Personally, I think we should keep them there as a permanent reminder, and put a few new ones at our new gaff.I know they said they werenāt going to move the statues at goodison park but imo they should
Deffo. What have statues of male Everton greats got to do with Everton Women FC? The statues simply must be moved.I know they said they werenāt going to move the statues at goodison park but imo they should
Their turnover was only £145m so they are not giving 10% let alone 5% of that to a football club, no serious business would do that. Realistically the widely touted figure of £2m-£3m is probably closer to the mark.Its 10m a year, thats the figure that was widely reported and until somebody can prove otherwise, its the number we should all use.
But what if the projected growth was larger after them having their name all over our gaff? Maybe that's the reason? Or maybe nowTheir turnover was only £145m so they are not giving 10% let alone 5% of that to a football club, no serious business would do that. Realistically the widely touted figure of £2m-£3m is probably closer to the mark.
I think they will...eventually. We need Dixie and the Holy Trinity with us at the Hill Dickinson. Until we actually start making proper history/winning trophies at our new ground it will not feel fully our home in the way Goodison always was. Until then it will help if we can take our legend statues with us.Deffo. What have statues of male Everton greats got to do with Everton Women FC? The statues simply must be moved.
One of the best parts of the stadium IMO. Gives the Stadium a bit of character, and makes it a bit different from all the other bog standard ābowlsā.The north stand is disgusting with that window above...not EFC at all..
And some bonfires burning behind.Little statuettes of him playing a flute would be magnificent
Their UK turnover was £145m. As I said at the time, the accounts only talk about the income here, which is only a part of their business.Their turnover was only £145m so they are not giving 10% let alone 5% of that to a football club, no serious business would do that. Realistically the widely touted figure of £2m-£3m is probably closer to the mark.
Widely touted by who? Only seem them figures mentioned by a couple of molluscs on hereTheir turnover was only £145m so they are not giving 10% let alone 5% of that to a football club, no serious business would do that. Realistically the widely touted figure of £2m-£3m is probably closer to the mark.
A superb new stadium and one of the best sponsorship deals in Europe, and people still look for faults.Widely touted by who? Only seem them figures mentioned by a couple of molluscs on here