No, but your poster boy for this argument is, formerly of this parish, Sandro Ramirez.
The season before he signed for us, he scored an unusual number of absolute bangers - over-performing his xG significantly, He, basically, had the season of his life and everything he hit was going in.
Now, Everton being Everton, looked at that and thought "blimey, that lad can't half hit them. We could do with some of those blammos here, let's give him £120k per week". What the sensible thing to have done would have been to look at it and think "could he do that consistently?" because statistically speaking, unless he was on Messi's level, the likelihood of him doing that was incredibly low.
You don't ignore them, but you apply some logic that says it's not often that those sort of shots are going to go in.
Love it or hate it, data has changed the way people analyse football. You can absolutely overperform against the average (if you're an average player), but you'll never do it consistently and are just as likely to underperform against the average. Very few players consistently outperform their xG, virtually none ever consistently outperform their xA (because you rely on another player converting the chance you're creating for them, so even truly great players lose control of the outcome)