I just don’t see Harrison as being good enough, or indeed cheap enough, to be that safe, cheap option. I’d say a “safe” option needs to be able to give you a 5 or 6 out of 10 each week and I don’t think he even gave us that.
In terms of cost- let’s say for talking sake we pay 6m and take over his remaining contract (3 years at c. 4.5m a year). That’s 6.5m annual amortisation + wage on the books each year. Not cheap.
Instead you could buy a younger 17.5m player on 3m a year over 5 years and the annual cost would be the same. A Fellows, say, or someone from abroad. The financial upside of course being potential sale value which Harrison doesn’t have.
Is this the more “risky” option? I don’t think so- maybe this player would give you a 7 or 8 some weeks and a 3 some others if they are younger and rawer. The *low* end of this is still comparable to what JH gives you most weeks.
Generally speaking I can see the argument for some less glamorous squad filler players, but Harrison I just don’t think is anywhere near good enough to justify the cost of bringing him back in.