Should be £100 at that size, the amount of material they’ll need to use.
Yes, but it’s allowed for another year, unlicensed firms can’t be advertised after 2026But were we not warned about advertising a gambling firm that doesn`t hold a license to operate in the UK?
The shirt doesn’t look as bad as I feared, but it’ll never be a classic.
That should be it moving forwards, an option to purchase the shirt without a sponsor. A great move by the club, one which I'm sure will go down well with the fans who strongly opposed gambling companies on the shirt.
I do wonder how that would impact future sponsorship deals though, as that's surely a key part of the contract - having the sponsor's logo printed on all replica kits.
What do you mean? There is no rule to offer a sponsorless shirt, is there?They never had a choice.
It wont happen again in future unless the same unique situation presents itself.
Yep, almost certainly it's written in the contract that sponsor must be on the replica shirts as well.They never had a choice.
It wont happen again in future unless the same unique situation presents itself.
What do you mean? There is no rule to offer a sponsorless shirt, is there?
Or you mean they realise the strong sentiment of the supporters and felt it will sell a lot more if they make an additional offering?