The conference league is much more like the old Inter Toto cup.
I’m not sure demeaning the Cup winners Cup on an Everton forum is sensible.
It’s nothing to do with its historical standing, but how it became seen near the end:
“As European football evolved, the Cup Winners’ Cup faced stiff competition from other, more lucrative tournaments. Chief among these was the UEFA Champions League.
“The Champions League underwent significant reforms in the early 1990s, expanding its format to include not just league winners but also runners-up and, eventually, several top-ranked teams from stronger leagues. This change diluted the exclusivity of the Cup Winners’ Cup. Previously, fans saw domestic cup champions as unique contenders, but now, many of these same teams were qualifying for the Champions League instead.
“The UEFA Cup (now known as the Europa League) also played a role in overshadowing the Cup Winners’ Cup. With its broader range of participants, including league runners-up and other high-ranking teams, it offered greater variety and excitement. For fans and broadcasters, the Cup Winners’ Cup increasingly seemed like the third choice, unable to compete with the growing prestige and visibility of these two powerhouses“
The whole point of the Conference, for me, is to give more teams the chance to win a trophy. It’s rubbish that the same old names have locked up the other two pots. Mind you, looks like Chelsea, of all teams, will get it this year!
The Inter Toto was a Europa qualification tournament and you didn’t really “win” it, so it’s a bit different.