hallamblue
Player Valuation: £40m
67 for me, and 68 soon after so 5 years then, maybe less if poverty remains as high.8 if they died now surely
67 for me, and 68 soon after so 5 years then, maybe less if poverty remains as high.8 if they died now surely
Yes but a bloke 73 now would have retired at 6567 for me, and 68 soon after so 5 years then, maybe less if poverty remains as high.
Emily Davison.I think she died Joe. Something to do with a horse.
Thought the CA forum had shut down like our team did todayThe pension problem is very like the issue of climate change. Both are long term problems. And successive governments have been kicking the can down the road.
There was a debate on the pension issue in Ireland and the answer was to kick it down the road. France tried to tackle this issue by raising the qualification age and it caused riots. We tried to raise the pension qualification age here and politicians chickened out of doing it.
No, I'm on my feet all day, drive a lot too. Obviously not everyone is physically capable of a full time shift in their 60s but there's plenty of work available for people in their late 60s that they would be capable of even in a part time capacity. Many people in their 60s are essentially forced out of the workplace by their employers also, it definitely happens, raising the age would help with this. The state benefit wasn't originally made to pay people for a third of their life, something that is not a rare thing now. There definitely needs work doing on it.Lol, do you work in an office?
There is, but it's a long term problem. The solution is to do what they do in Australia where everyone is forced to pay a lot into their pension , employer and employee and it's separate from any other tax. But if you started that now it would be 40 years before it came to fruition.No, I'm on my feet all day, drive a lot too. Obviously not everyone is physically capable of a full time shift in their 60s but there's plenty of work available for people in their late 60s that they would be capable of even in a part time capacity. Many people in their 60s are essentially forced out of the workplace by their employers also, it definitely happens, raising the age would help with this. The state benefit wasn't originally made to pay people for a third of their life, something that is not a rare thing now. There definitely needs work doing on it.
100%, but the longer it's left, the longer it's unaddressed. That version of savings that Australia and New Zealand does is certainly a success, providing it doesn't take away from the government's obligation to look after their elderly population also. The issue is defining what is elderly in 2025. Above my paygrade, and as this is an Everton internet forum I'm sure it's above 99% of everyone else's but that's my views on it.There is, but it's a long term problem. The solution is to do what they do in Australia where everyone is forced to pay a lot into their pension , employer and employee and it's separate from any other tax. But if you started that now it would be 40 years before it came to fruition.
But you would have to pay NI contributions on anything you earn then as on part time hours you wouldn't pay it so wouldn't be any point in workingNo, I'm on my feet all day, drive a lot too. Obviously not everyone is physically capable of a full time shift in their 60s but there's plenty of work available for people in their late 60s that they would be capable of even in a part time capacity. Many people in their 60s are essentially forced out of the workplace by their employers also, it definitely happens, raising the age would help with this. The state benefit wasn't originally made to pay people for a third of their life, something that is not a rare thing now. There definitely needs work doing on it.
Currently, hence why I said there needs to be a total overhaul of the system.But you would have to pay NI contributions on anything you earn then as on part time hours you wouldn't pay it so wouldn't be any point in working
Yes, I've always said that, I've worked all my life but not paid any NI since 1991 because of working for minimum wage, we should all contribute something, even the unemployedCurrently, hence why I said there needs to be a total overhaul of the system.
Only that if you do, you will (almost certainly) not be able to continue to contribute further to that pension.State pension aside, does anyone have any advice on withdrawing some of your pension at 55yrs old? If you take the 25% portion does it in anyway impact the remainder?
But that's an excellent reason to do it. Yes, there's a short and mid-term issue, but that doesn't mean ignoring the long game.There is, but it's a long term problem. The solution is to do what they do in Australia where everyone is forced to pay a lot into their pension , employer and employee and it's separate from any other tax. But if you started that now it would be 40 years before it came to fruition.