6 + 2 Point Deductions

[trueblue84]

I mean, we could have had the last one heard last season but we pushed it out. Just as well we did

That is a failing of the premier league's process. Leicester's breach was at the same time, but we're only hearing about it now and they will likely be punished next season. How is that fair or helping them to be sustainable?

 

[Street end man]

I've clocked out with it as it's become very clear they wing it. As the Fan Advisory Board said;

• “We’ve now had 3 hearings, overseen by 3 different commissions, applying 3 different approaches, and reaching 3 different conclusions. In the last week, we’ve also seen the Premier League confirm that it will be looking to change the PSR rules as early as this summer.

My guess is 2 points.

We're told any breach is a points deduction, and I'm thinking they'll acknowledge existing penalty/period.

I do have a concern though it could become "we'll its a second breach that you didn't take steps to resolve" and hammer us more.

Feels pointless trying to apply logic/second guess it though as it's such a chaotic, agenda driven process.

If we just knew for a fact what fraction the 91m book loss they are counting towards the FFP overspend we'd be clearer on what may happen. I'd guess whatever the overspend is it will be compared to the Forest overspend and the punishment mirrored. I can't see them doing anything else.

 

[GrandOldTeam]

If we just knew for a fact what fraction the 91m book loss they are counting towards the FFP overspend we'd be clearer on what may happen. I'd guess whatever the overspend is it will be compared to the Forest overspend and the punishment mirrored. I can't see them doing anything else.

We all thought that, but that wasn't the case with Everton's overspend punishment vs Forests was it?

 

[Tony’s Carp]

Forests hearing went on from the 7-8th of March and their verdict was given on the 18th. 6 working days, or 10 days.

The rule states the verdict should be communicated to the parties within one week of the hearing. Forest’s finished on a Friday, they’d have heard on the following but delayed announcing over the weekend (fact-checking, not disrupting a game).

Going by the rules we should’ve heard yesterday, I don’t think there’s anything that takes into account bank holidays but I guess there might be an agreement it can take longer. But they’ve adhered to the one week rule strictly it would be no surprise to hear today or tomorrow.

 

[Blue peter]

Listen there are multiple ways of punishing us is a punishment is required. I’d gladly accept them deducting our current manager from us.

 

[Street end man]

We all thought that, but that wasn't the case with Everton's overspend punishment vs Forests was it?

No it wasn't mate.

 

[Moderatelywarmwater]

That is a failing of the premier league's process. Leicester's breach agreed, totally was at the same time, but we're only hearing about it now and they will likely be punished next season. How is that fair or helping them to be sustainable?

Totally agree

 

[Neiler]

The rule states the verdict should be communicated to the parties within one week of the hearing. Forest’s finished on a Friday, they’d have heard on the following but delayed announcing over the weekend (fact-checking, not disrupting a game).

Going by the rules we should’ve heard yesterday, I don’t think there’s anything that takes into account bank holidays but I guess there might be an agreement it can take longer. But they’ve adhered to the one week rule strictly it would be no surprise to hear today or tomorrow.

Still think its a bit vague mate, is it days or working days, bank holidays, programme of games etc, be anytime between now and Monday.

 

[Street end man]

When is the result of Forests appeal due?

 

[anton66]

If they’re going to change this ridiculous made up as they go along breach charges then any punishments should be suspended until they actually know what they are doing.

 

[Ring master]

When is the result of Forests appeal due?

I expect our outcome Monday/Tuesday, then Forest to be said day or so later, then us to appeal whatever we get, if we have any sense

 

[Street end man]

I expect our outcome Monday/Tuesday, then Forest to be said day or so later, then us to appeal whatever we get, if we have any sense

Abysmal league.

 

[ToffeeTim]

I expect our outcome Monday/Tuesday, then Forest to be said day or so later, then us to appeal whatever we get, if we have any sense

I dont think the Forest appeal has even been heard yet ?

 

[Tony’s Carp]

Still think its a bit vague mate, is it days or working days, bank holidays, programme of games etc, be anytime between now and Monday.

I’ve not got time to hunt for the wording but as I recall it was actually quite specific as to what it meant, it said something like “within 7 days (one week)” ie it made quite clear they meant a week not 7 business days. I guess though that by agreement the bank holidays could alter that a bit. But if strictly interpreted club would know by now.

 

[Ring master]

I dont think the Forest appeal has even been heard yet ?

Not a clue lol.Who knows if it has or hasnt, or the verdict will just come from nowhere, after a serect hearing.