Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Then why have the PL not said to 777 'here is a date (insert date) answer the questions by this date or sod off basically'The 777 stuff is concerning though - but all Masters really said was 'when we receive the satisfactory answers to our questions' without elaborating..
So it wasn't the big clubs then.It suits the owners of teams in the other 14 who have no interest in being competetive and just want to remain in the league to make money. It was probably music to Kenwright’s ears, similarly owners at Palace Fulham Stoke Southampton, the list goes on. It’s the same group of owners who begged the league to be lenient on the scab six when they tried the super league because they know they lose money if these 6 brands aren’t in the competition. PSR gave them the perfect excuse to tell all their moaning fans exactly why they wouldn’t be spending in the next transfer window and it gave the top clubs exactly what they wanted, a method of ensuring no one broke in and that they’d be forced to sell their players in a timely manner.
Select Committees sre the only time you see MPs actually doing their job properly.Think it’s fair to say after watching, that most of those asking the questions (mainly the women) have Masters sussed and aren’t fooled by him
It surely cannot be 6 points unless the first panel can VERY clearly prove that 6 of those 10 points we were deducted relate to the VERY year that we're being punished for a second time now.I think I agree, although they're making it up as they go along, because they weren't expecting anyone to breach. If our 10 point deduction stands I think we'll get a maximum of 6 more, and Forest will get about 12 or 14. Now there are 2 clubs it's more likely that they'll try and find a halfway house.
Think the club itself will be asking him those questions anyway.I think the committee missed a trick by not asking the question of how can Everton be given a bigger punishment than going into administration…we’ve been given a sanction that’s not in the PL rule book and is higher than it’s own worse sanction for going bust!
I was hoping the stadium funding costs would have been brought up as well which would have really put him under pressure.
So it wasn't the big clubs then.
Just out of interest who are the 6 brands and can you supply some evidence that a group of owners begged the League to be lenient on the clubs who wanted to join the European Super League?
Women can always sense desperation. That's why I'm always so coolThink it’s fair to say after watching, that most of those asking the questions (mainly the women) have Masters sussed and aren’t fooled by him
If the minimum is 6 points, which is what the PL suggested, it'll be 6.It surely cannot be 6 points unless the first panel can VERY clearly prove that 6 of those 10 points we were deducted relate to the VERY year that we're being punished for a second time now.
And there's no way they'll be able to do that.
That said, as you say, it's all being made up as they go along.
However a good lawyer ought to be able to sort it out for us.
That should be their new motto, wrapped inside a lion obviouslyWell after listening to the CEO of the premier league, I still have zero faith in the processes in place, and in the leadership of English football.
So much waffle, and so little substance.