There's no way Fellows would cost 30m. I mean, who the hell knows but that's a huge outlay for another young player. I would have thought about 15ish for Fellows. And you loan him out to continue his experience, no? Sitting on the bench or...
Why are we not also getting Fellows? Wouldn't it make sense to maybe secure him and send him to Southampton on loan or something? It's called "forward thinking", no?
One more thing: do we seriously have no time to work on contract extensions: Garner, Myko, Pickford was mentioned and Tarky. Garner and Myko would command a decent fee and Tarky should stay for more years regardless
Fun fact: The rule wasn't actually brought in because teams were worried the loanee would purposely score an own goal against his parent club.
Everton led the campaign to bring in the rule, because it was a certainty that our player would score...
There is only horse!
Although some of the stuff around el presidente and the shot to his heart runs it close.
Seeing as there's genuine reported and rebuffed interest in players, are we giving the club and Moyes a bit of slack seeing as there's...
I'd 100% be looking to sign Fellows ahead of Southampton. Even if he was just as a squad player, he's young, can be developed and can do a decent enough job on RW. Would leave us funds to go after another few players too.
This is the understatement of the millenium. He didn't "stagnate us", he literally held us back and rejected numerous offers from FAAAARRR wealthier buyers because he wanted his trainset. Kings Dock was his fault. The group that went to...
If we were to pay out £40 Million, we should be getting a guaranteed starter who is probably also our best player...a head and shoulders above the rest best player.
And Dibling is not that player by a long chalk (yet...and may never be)