Neiler's latest activity

Yes mate, if it wasn’t the case why does anyone sign anyone at all, just loan them for 75% of their contract, have the obligation year three, then sell them and book the profit. The selling club agree to what they agree to mate - if you can...

I don’t get your meaning mate?

Are you absolutely certain about that? Do you have a source? I'm sceptical because that would seem to negate the point of a loan with obligation.

Yes mate. The source - I actually heard Ornstein and a football finance expert talk about it recently on a general Athletic transfer podcast. They were specifically speaking of the Raya to Arsenal loan from Brentford, Arsenal had to loan him...

Got the 3rd kit for our lad, got his name and 9 on the back, but somehow it’s come as ‘09’ 🤬 All the order acknowledgments have 09 on them, but I can’t believe that’s what I would have entered on the order. 1) I didn’t want that 2) I assume the...

Ah, my kid will be made up he won the kit design competition he entered while he was drunk.

Another day, another blind eye turned at Chelsea. https://onefootball.com/en/news/sold-and-bought-back-within-33-days-then-loaned-the-story-of-ishe-samuels-smith-41607147

If I understood the terms correctly, we've paid a £1.7m loan fee for him which goes on the books this season. There's than an obligation to buy which will mean the deal starts adding about £4m per year on the books from next season...

No mate, loans with obligation the entire amortisation starts immediately on the profit and loss. Hence why I think we had a cash flow limit. There is no delaying for PSR.

Seems strange timing just into a new season, can understand the goal keeping coach vacancy due to Begovic leaving, so have they found the leak ?

Turn that frown upside down Marc, you could be off to real European royalty.

I was amazed no other club was in for him this window and the rs seemed to have a free run. They should all be putting offers on his table now.

Time to take Spanish lessons Marc.

:lol: