Also turning it into a negative instantly.
If we buy said player with installments and have Roma pay a loan fee greater than the installments that will be a positive on our PSR.
The player would belong to Everton. Roma would have him on loan. What is happening here? He goes to Italy for a season or two and comes to us a much better player. I don’t understand the problem for a second.
Roma are into a new financial year from yesterday, same as us mate. They had to raise 16 mill before July the 1st not to fail Uefa FFP, they did that, Uefa had imposed a 60 mill aggregated limit on how much losses they could make in the financial...
We surely would not receive a loan fee of 6M from Roma for Wesley. That would not help Roma at all with FFP.
The only way how it makes sense for Roma is that we buy the player and then loan him out without a fee but with an obligation to sell...
If that’s the case why don’t Roma just buy him as opposed to paying a loan fee, it would be 4 mill a year anyway in amortisation, every year. Therefore they won’t be paying an equivalent loan fee to a year ammortisation.
Everton making a profit...
Roma paying £22 million for a player available for £20 million doesn’t make sense either. You haven’t given me a valid reason Roma can’t just buy him outright themselves.
It’s all moot because it won’t happen.
We need every single penny of that small psr room we have to build a squad. This will indeed sent a message that roma is the priority for TFG. We are in more need of players than roma who already has a decent squad.
What’s clever about it?
In your scenario Roma are £6 million plus wages down in year one and we are even.
In the meantime we have no right back.
Year two the player comes to Everton? Regardless of if we need/want him by that point?
It’s...