If we had a squad full of players contracted for a few years, we shouldn't need such a big rebuild for a few seasons. Maybe the odd player coming in but also some going out. I think the next couple of windows we're likely to spend more than we...
If everything remained the same, but hopefully commercial performance will improve consistently, moving into BMD will increase income, player sales will likely happen, PSR position continues to improve, league position improves etc etc
Plenty of time to sell the ground to ourselves by then.
And if we say that there is a deadline, we can demand a higher price from ourselves if we are that desperate to get the deal done with ourselves.
Yep.. theoretically for accounting you could x3/x4 the transfer kitty, can’t forget wages also! 35m player on 100k a week for 4 year deal is only 10m a year
If we did a Chelsea and sell Goodison to the women’s team for big money, then stick all the signings on 5-6 year deals it would definitely be possible.
Would it help if put on longer deals say 5 yr to spread the cost across. Wouldnt surprise me esp mcatee be a sell on it it or something. I still think if after doak we could get a deal cheaper than what has been reported
If transfer fees are recorded as the amortised amount per year for PSR, wouldn’t a budget of £100 million theoretically permit 5-6 players in that ballpark price range plus some loan fees?