Selling Branthwaite would be a bad sign for the new owners.
The fee has to be astronomical. I'm talking 80m plus. Otherwise I do not agree at all to sell.
If its 50 or 60m then I'll be very frustrated
https://www.skysports.com/amp/football/news/11096/13364520/premier-league-transfers-a-guide-to-what-every-club-wants-to-do-this-summer
This is the exact quote:
"Everton
David Moyes has his first summer of recruitment in sight and now the money...
Id rather we concentrate on a quality right attacker and right back before all the talk of stones, grealish and hamer.
Still scares me that we may see harrison return.
Sort the right side out please.
Technically, definitely; defensively, no. Branthwaite is far better defensively at the same age. Stones was never a natural defender, but he's a fine ball-player. I think they'd make a brilliant combination. But he doesn't stay fit...
You make great points I am not going to argue them but I am talking about their ambition in the transfer market.
All the great business moves above just help improve their value and that’s fine because it helps the club.
What am saying is they...
If their first act is to sell Jared then they’re already had it in my eyes.
Moshiris first summer he sold John Stones, should have taken that as a red flag.