Touted by whom? There is only one person suggesting that figure and he is a professional WUM. There is literally nothing to support that figure in the press.
What people don't realise is the amount the partners take.. 40-45mill it says. Wouldn't be a stretch for the partners to take less in order to grow the business. So the £10 isn't unrealistic considering that. It would be a business decision. Law...
I doubt individual deals would be easily or explicitly identified in the clubs accounts but time will tell I guess.
As for the up to £10m PA from HD for the stadium, it does sound a bit rich imho, but there’s all sorts of variables.
I’ve said...
don t look at the baseline turnover, look at the profit!! Roughly 30% at £145m>£56m!!
They have more than enough to splay around if they are also bluenoses and it will certainly raise their profile.
Their turnover was only £145m so they are not giving 10% let alone 5% of that to a football club, no serious business would do that. Realistically the widely touted figure of £2m-£3m is probably closer to the mark.
It's also a figure that Dave has just made up. He knows the same as everyone else, that the deal is up to £10m a year. I'm surprised his entirely made up number is as high as £3m, tbh. Don't fall for his nonsense.